Elites provoke resentment. They hoard influence, they protect their own circles, and they rarely face the same consequences as the rest of society. Yet without them, things would collapse far quicker. For all their corruption and arrogance, elites impose restraint. They keep crowds from turning fear into brutality, they delay rash decisions. They write rules where mobs want shortcuts. This is not about admiration. It is about recognizing that restraint often saves lives.
The crowd’s violent instincts
People fear crime more than anything else. Out of this fear, they reach for extreme measures. They demand the death penalty not only for murderers but also for petty offenders. And they cheer for vigilantes who skip trials and deliver quick punishment. They call for humiliations, for harsher sentences, and for methods designed to break rather than correct. Many even ask for torture, believing that pain delivers order. These instincts repeat across centuries. Pain feels like justice. Mercy feels like weakness.
How outrage becomes law
Rage does not stay in the streets. It climbs into parliaments. One shocking crime dominates headlines. Politicians then promise to “fix it once and for all.” They translate anger into law. Mandatory minimums, expanded registries, and new categories of crimes appear overnight. Oversight disappears. Courts become tools for public anger rather than guardians of fairness. Rights shrink while prisons overflow. In the end, the law itself becomes a weapon of vengeance rather than a shield of justice.
Populism and the economy
The mob does not stop at punishment. It also destroys balance sheets. Populist impulses demand more subsidies, reckless tax cuts, and spending without limits. Citizens ask for everything at once: new prisons, more police, cheaper services, and lower taxes. To satisfy them, leaders borrow heavily. Budgets implode. Education and health care starve while funds pour into concrete walls and armored vehicles. The illusion of order devours the reality of stability.
Scapegoating the weak
When rage looks for easy targets, it rarely chooses the powerful. It finds the weak instead. The mentally ill become “problems” to be hidden away. The disabled are treated as burdens. Migrants and the poor are painted as criminals before they even act. At its darkest, history shows how such thinking escalates. Asylums become prisons. Camps become killing grounds. Gas chambers appear after people stop seeing individuals and start seeing categories. The mob’s instinct for cruelty grows when the powerless have no defenders.
Elites as a brake on chaos
Elites, for all their corruption, fear chaos more than they fear shame. They own wealth that loses value when riots erupt. They need courts that enforce contracts and currencies that hold value; they depend on borders that remain open and markets that remain predictable. Therefore, they install brakes. They create veto points, procedures, and professional checks. And they sign treaties that forbid cruelty. They construct legal systems that insist on trials, on evidence, and on appeals. None of this makes them saints. But it makes them stable guardians against disaster.
Elites as enactors of humane policies
Crowds often attack politicians for corruption, yet the same crowds return to vote for clientelist parties. They complain about self-interest, yet they depend on elites to maintain the system. And ironically, elites are often the ones who enact humane policies against mob instincts. They create centers for drug addicts when mobs demand punishment. They fund rehabilitation programs when crowds call for exile. They build shelters for the homeless when voters prefer invisibility.
The same logic applies to immigration. Migrants often face a cruel dilemma: die slowly in their homeland or risk dying quickly on the sea. The mob sees them as invaders. The mob demands walls and pushbacks. Yet elites, pressured by international norms and by their own interest in global order, at least create asylum systems and refugee centers. These measures may be inadequate, even cynical, yet they are still more humane than what mobs demand. Elites, seeking stability, provide minimal dignity where rage would deliver cruelty.
The myth of right laws
People often say, “We just need the right laws.” But no law is naturally right. Laws written in anger reflect anger. Statutes passed in haste reflect haste. A majority can demand barbaric rules that look “right” in the moment yet destroy lives for decades. The only real safeguard is procedure: due process, trials, evidence, and appeals. These frustrate the crowd, but they save the innocent. They prevent the majority from rewriting justice into revenge.
Democracy versus mob rule
Democracy does not mean mob rule. It means citizens choose leaders who then govern through institutions. Elections provide legitimacy, not a license for daily cruelty. Politicians must still obey rules, courts, and oversight. Institutions absorb popular rage, filter it, and translate it into policies that balance liberty and security. Without these buffers, democracy collapses into mobocracy. Consent is valuable, but only when paired with restraint.
Guardrails against cruelty
Society needs hard guardrails that even majorities cannot cross. Torture must be banned with no exceptions. Interrogations must be recorded. Statements obtained by force must be excluded. Whistleblowers inside prisons and police must be protected. Data on use of force must be published. Independent commissions must oversee sentencing and solitary confinement. These measures look technical, even boring. But they prevent nightmares. They keep cruelty from becoming normalized.
Crises and mob temptation
Fear peaks during crises. Terrorist attacks, pandemics, or sudden crime waves push societies toward extremes. Politicians then offer safety in exchange for rights. People accept because the danger feels immediate. Later, the emergency passes, but the new powers remain. That is why limits must be pre-set. Certain rights must never suspend. Courts must stay open. Budgets must remain transparent. Even in panic, procedures must survive.
Thought experiment of pure mob rule
Imagine a week of direct mob power. Day one: death penalty expanded to dozens of crimes. Day two: collective punishment for whole neighborhoods. Day three: new censorship rules passed for “stability.” Day four: spending explodes on prisons and police while taxes are slashed. Day five: migrants rounded up. Day six: mentally ill locked away “for their own good.” By day seven, prisons overflow, the economy collapses, and troops patrol the streets. This is not imagination. History shows how quickly it can happen.
Shadow eminences and the diversion game
While elites often resist the mob’s worst instincts, another group thrives in the shadows. These shadow eminences—hidden oligarchs, magnates, and fixers—do not fear mob violence in the same way. Instead, they manipulate it. They understand how outrage works. They know the crowd reacts faster to stories of robbers walking free than to complex tales of billion-dollar fraud. So they feed the public those stories, again and again.
Newspapers fill with headlines about petty criminals who “escaped with a lenient sentence.” Talk shows rage about judges “betraying victims.” Politicians echo the fury with promises of tougher penalties. Yet behind this noise, larger crimes unfold quietly. Shadow elites move billions offshore, evade taxes, and buy influence. Their corruption dwarfs the harm of petty theft, but it receives less attention because public anger has been skillfully redirected.
This tactic works because the mob loves simple villains. A burglar is visible, concrete, and relatable. People imagine themselves as victims of the next break-in. But they cannot picture the damage caused by market manipulation, accounting fraud, or secretive lobbying. These crimes feel abstract, even though they devastate entire economies. The shadow eminences exploit this gap in perception. They let the mob howl about robbers, while they continue to plunder unseen.
Thus, the elites restrain mob cruelty, but the hidden powers channel mob energy for their own protection. Outrage becomes theater. The people fight ghosts, while the real puppeteers pull strings in silence.
The elites have data, the mob only hate
One reason elites can resist mob instincts is that they operate with information, while the crowd acts with emotion. Elites commission studies, gather intelligence, and track long-term patterns. They know which policies actually reduce crime, which economic moves stabilize budgets, and which social programs prevent collapse. They may not always act on this knowledge ethically, but at least they possess it.
The mob, by contrast, does not deal in facts. It deals in anger. Its energy comes from fear, resentment, and the urge to strike back. People see one shocking crime and demand harsher penalties. They hear one rumor about migrants and demand border walls. They witness one budget scandal and demand to cut every program at once. None of this rests on analysis. It rests on raw emotion.
Elites use data to justify complex policies—drug rehabilitation centers, refugee processing systems, or gradual fiscal adjustments—that mobs would never tolerate. Crowds see addicts and call for punishment; elites read numbers and know that treatment saves money and lives. Crowds see migrants as invaders; elites see demographic charts showing labor shortages. Crowds want instant results; elites understand that real solutions take years.
This creates an ugly paradox. Elites are corrupt, self-interested, and often detached, yet their data-driven decisions still protect society from the mob’s destructive impulses. The mob shouts in rage. The elites calculate with statistics. Between anger and analysis, only one side has the tools to keep a nation alive.
Conclusion
The world does not offer us the comfort of noble rulers or noble crowds. It offers us elites who are corrupt yet calculating, and mobs who are passionate yet destructive. Between these two forces, survival depends not on purity but on restraint. Elites hoard privilege, bend rules, and protect their own circles, but they also block lynch justice, delay reckless spending, and create procedures that stop anger from becoming law. They design drug centers where mobs would build prisons. They open refugee programs where mobs would raise walls. They protect rights through boring paperwork while crowds demand blood.
This is why gratitude, though uncomfortable, is necessary. Without elites, societies would be governed by hysteria and vengeance. Without procedures, mobs would devour the weak and bankrupt the strong. Elites are not saints, but they are brakes. They are imperfect protectors against the crowd’s cruelty. At the same time, trust must remain limited. Shadow powers divert outrage to cover their theft. Politicians trade favors. Oligarchs manipulate laws. Vigilance is as vital as gratitude.
The real defense of civilization lies in combining elite restraint with public vigilance. Institutions must stay strong. Procedures must stay intact. Humane policies must override cruelty. The mob will always hate, and the elites will always scheme. But if rules endure, lives can be spared. In the end, we should be thankful we are ruled by the elites—not because they are good, but because the alternative is far worse.
Leave a Reply