Tag: science

  • Wikipedia – Instead of promoting rationality, they tell you how many people died somewhere

    Who would think that Wikipedia which should promote scientific discourse, free inquiry, and rationality is living in obscurantism? People are evolutionary programmed that if you kill a child that is a problem (and, of course, it should be). And since the means of contraception didn’t exist nearly all the time people were in existence, when…

  • These liars offer you the 2-dimensional political spectrum. Here’s the reality

    This is my modest suggestion on how the multidimensional spectrum should look like. But, of course, politicians and lobbyists are adamant. More redistribution/Less redistributionLiberal/ConservativeAnti-consumerism/ConsumerismTens of percent of GDP investing in science/Little investment in scienceTrillions of dollars for building whole countries/Little aidComplex grasp of what surplus value is and how to change the constellation of the…

  • Did Hitler look more Czech than German?

    Observing people’s cheekbones, facial and skull profile is one of the lowest low you can fall into. We don’t judge people by their appearance or nationality. But when it comes to racist, racially hateful, antisemitic and primitive eugenics adherents, let’s make an exception. Germans are – to some degree, of course – different from Czechs…

  • Cancer cure vs. obscene multinational corporations profits

    In total, Fortune 500 companies represent two-thirds of the U.S. GDP with $18 trillion in revenues (up 13%), while profits, down 15%, fell for the second time in the past three years. The estimated global scale of profit shifting is close to 1 trillion USD and related tax revenue losses range between 200 and 300…

  • What IQ (g factor) isn’t and the most common misconceptions

    Despite it was discovered arguably lately (compared to physics, mathematics, engineering, and so on) it is one of the most statistically significant concepts in humanities. And as we know humanities not only know significantly less compared to exact sciences but their ways of proving are very limited. This article covers likely something that you already…

  • Are Asians not creative? Few Nobel prizes in literature and science

    They often say that Asians’ lack of creativity is a myth. And those who don’t think so point out to faulty formal education system that is around Asia. But what about the huge Asian American minority? These children are fully integrated into the American formal education system and we see no Nobelists or excellent novelists.…

  • If the DNA was known in Hitler’s era, all countries would have had to conduct eugenics

    Imagine that DNA was discovered during Hitler’s era and modification of embryos was available at the same time. Fearless, extremely immoral, crime-less, ecstatically happy, enormously healthy super-soldiers with IQ of 190 would be present in the Third Reich if massive genome research would have undergone. Not only the Third Reich’s scientific research would win by…

  • Obama crying because of the Sandy Hook massacre could have brought millions of people alive

    Don’t get me wrong. This was an inexcusable, heinous, and despicable crime. However, there is another side to the story. Contraception didn’t exist for the absolute majority time of human existence. So when people don’t have kids it’s okay. This is how nature programmed us. But when you kill a kid, well that’s a problem…

  • What if China completely succumbed to the United States

    China is a problem for the US because the super-rich groups cannot control it economically (thus politically – big business rules in every country). If China let the USA control her, the massive prison torture would have to end. It same goes for the genocide of Uyghurs. Democracy would prevail. China would be just like…

  • Kids, this is creationism: Why New York City had never existed and it is scientifically impossible for it to exist

    Creationism is a delusion-like cult. They are denying the obvious. And while the evolution theory is based on extremely heavy-loaded and mutually-supporting evidence the whole creationism consists of mutually incompatible branches that are evidence-free and absolutely wrong. Their silly arguments are: look at the interconnection within organs, it cannot be an accident; look at the…