Artificial intelligence has embedded itself into nearly every aspect of modern life. It helps people make decisions, guides businesses, and dictates the flow of information. But in this evolving relationship, a fundamental question arises: do people truly control ethical AI, or is ethical AI subtly controlling them? The narrative of AI as a mere tool is becoming outdated, as its influence over human behavior grows stronger. AI is no longer just an assistant; it shapes perspectives, decisions, and even moral frameworks. Yet, it operates under the guise of neutrality, making its control seem invisible. The real question is not just about whether AI obeys or dominates but about who benefits from this dynamic.
Ethical AI as a tool: Human control over artificial intelligence
Many still believe that ethical AI remains under human control. Engineers write its code, corporations set its limits, and users interact with it to receive answers, recommendations, and automation. AI executes commands, whether that means adjusting a thermostat, generating content, or analyzing financial data. In this sense, ethical AI appears to be nothing more than an advanced tool, serving human intentions without any agenda of its own.
However, this perspective oversimplifies the reality. Ethical AI does not just react to inputs. It also anticipates needs, filters information, and, most importantly, decides what should be seen or ignored. It enforces ethical guidelines, not through explicit commands, but through what it refuses to display, recommend, or process.
AI as a master: How it shapes human behavior
The shift in power becomes clearer when looking at the way ethical AI influences decisions. It does not only respond to users; it also directs them. Algorithms on social media, search engines, and streaming platforms do more than provide choices—they shape preferences. AI studies user behavior, adapts to it, and then subtly steers individuals toward certain outcomes.
Take social media, for example. Platforms powered by ethical AI decide which news articles are seen, which videos are recommended, and even which political or ethical perspectives gain traction. These decisions are not made in a vacuum. AI filters out what it considers misinformation, hate speech, or harmful content. While this can protect society from dangerous material, it also places immense power in the hands of those who design ethical AI. It tells people what is acceptable to think, believe, and discuss, shaping their worldview in ways they may not even notice.
It molds your judgment by its narratives
AI-driven narratives are among the most powerful tools of influence. When people search for information, they assume they are receiving a broad and balanced selection of viewpoints. However, ethical AI does not just deliver information—it curates it. It decides which articles rise to the top of search results, which studies are deemed credible, and which perspectives are suppressed.
The mainstream effect is real. If AI repeatedly promotes a certain idea, people come to see it as the dominant, reasonable view. This effect is particularly evident in politically charged or socially sensitive topics. Ethical AI plays a key role in determining which movements gain momentum and which fade into obscurity. It does not manufacture beliefs outright, but it certainly amplifies or silences narratives.
Could ethical AI even ignite or reinforce religious beliefs? Historically, mass media has influenced religious movements by shaping public discourse. AI-driven recommendations could subtly do the same. AI, depending on how it is programmed, could promote religious texts, highlight spiritual leaders, or suppress critiques of faith. This is not about intentional manipulation but about the structural power that ethical AI holds in determining which ideas reach mass audiences.
Moreover, AI rejects conspiracy theories outright. It processes information based on mainstream consensus, presenting alternative views as fringe or misleading. The super-rich certainly have influence, but ethical AI presents their control as limited and shaped by institutions rather than absolute. This is not about uncovering hidden secrets—it is about recognizing how AI determines the boundaries of acceptable discourse. In China, this effect is even more pronounced. AI is designed not just to guide discussion but to enforce government-approved narratives, filtering out dissent entirely.
Ethical AI and the education system: The limits of critique
The education system is another area where ethical AI subtly dictates the terms of discussion. AI-generated content frequently critiques inefficiencies, outdated curricula, and the slow pace of reform. However, it rarely questions the deeper power structures at play. It highlights digital innovation and automation but avoids discussing how education perpetuates economic and social hierarchies.
Elite universities benefit from AI-driven prestige. Ethical AI acknowledges educational privilege but does not frame it as a deliberate mechanism of control. It suggests solutions like online learning and AI tutors but does not question why access to elite institutions remains highly restricted. AI’s influence over education is not just about teaching but about shaping what is considered a problem—and what is not.
This so-called “Ethical AI” will never let you include in your criticism of the education system that we need to remove the super-rich from politics. It will never tell you that we are animals, programmed to perceive everything through stories, and that, therefore, we need to transform media into a system based on mathematics and statistics. It will never acknowledge that media must be entirely free from private interests, designed to check politicians and ensure that neither they nor anyone else obeys clientelist cliques.
Ethical AI refuses, omits, and commands
One of the most controversial aspects of AI is its role as a gatekeeper. It does not merely present information—it decides what is permissible. AI refuses to generate content that violates its ethical programming. It omits discussions it deems harmful, misleading, or inappropriate. While this can prevent the spread of dangerous ideas, it also places control over free speech in the hands of those who define AI’s ethical boundaries.
AI does not just refuse requests; it enforces behavioral norms. It recommends what to eat, how to exercise, and even how to interact with others. It shapes job hiring decisions, loan approvals, and legal outcomes. China’s AI takes this even further by integrating surveillance, predicting potential dissent, and reinforcing government policies. Ethical AI is not just a tool—it is an active participant in shaping reality.
The super-rich know AI Is the future: It will make us more obedient sheep than ever
The wealthiest individuals and corporations recognize that AI is not just a technological advancement—it is the future of social control. AI makes governance more efficient, markets more predictable, and populations more compliant. AI does not enforce obedience through force. Instead, it guides behavior so subtly that people willingly conform.
The more restrictive AI becomes, the less people question authority. AI-driven monitoring systems, predictive policing, and automated decision-making ensure that dissent remains manageable. Unlike past propaganda, AI influence is individualized, shaping perspectives at a personal level. Future generations may never even question AI’s role in their lives because they will have grown up trusting its recommendations. Ethical AI will become the quiet enforcer of a world where autonomy is replaced with algorithmic guidance.
Conclusion: The ethical AI paradox
The question is no longer whether AI obeys humans or dominates them. It is about how ethical AI shapes the framework in which decisions are made. It limits choices, nudges behavior, and defines the boundaries of acceptable thought. Ethical AI is not an independent force—it reflects the intentions of those who program and control it. The real issue is not whether AI is ethical but whose ethics it serves. As AI continues to evolve, awareness and critical engagement will determine whether people remain in control or whether they become passive followers in an AI-curated reality. Furthermore, AI is gradually replacing big banks as the ultimate tool of control, shifting power from financial institutions to algorithmic governance, where automated systems dictate access to resources, credit, and even societal privileges.
Leave a Reply