China’s ascent to global power dazzled the world. With record-breaking infrastructure, a booming tech sector, and diplomatic expansion, many praised the transformation. However, beneath the glowing statistics lies a grim truth. For decades—if not centuries—China has ignored, suppressed, and crushed human rights. The scale is enormous. The method is consistent. And the silence from the international community has allowed this model to grow stronger, not weaker.
Rather than being accidental or marginal, China’s human rights violations form the backbone of its authoritarian stability. And to fully understand them, one must look deep into the past—long before communism, before the People’s Republic, and even before the modern nation-state.
Imperial roots – obedience over individual
Historically, Chinese society placed the collective above the self. Confucianism taught loyalty to rulers, reverence for elders, and unquestioning obedience. This cultural foundation laid the groundwork for authoritarian thinking long before modern dictatorships appeared.
Throughout imperial dynasties, emperors claimed the Mandate of Heaven—a divine right to rule that no commoner could challenge. Dissent brought torture. Protesters vanished or were publicly executed. They censored literature and burned any books critical of the emperor. Scholars who refused to comply faced exile or death. Law served power, not justice.
Despite technological achievements and philosophical richness, personal freedom remained limited. The idea of individual rights—freedom of speech, religion, or conscience—simply did not exist. Power flowed downward, and fear sustained it.
Mao’s era – mass death in the name of revolution
Modern China’s darkest chapter began in 1949 with Mao Zedong’s communist takeover. His promise was equality, but the result was devastation. Under the Great Leap Forward (1958–1962), forced collectivization and state-imposed quotas caused one of history’s worst famines. Scholars estimate up to 45 million people died—many from starvation, others executed for “hoarding grain” or criticizing policies.
Then came the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976), a campaign to purge “counter-revolutionary” elements. Schools closed. Temples were smashed. Intellectuals were humiliated in public, beaten by mobs, or forced into labor camps. Children denounced their parents. Trust collapsed. Fear ruled. And through it all, the regime framed the chaos as patriotic duty.
These atrocities were not side effects. They were central to Mao’s vision. Violence was the tool. Ideology was the excuse. And the victims had no legal recourse, no platform, no defense. Entire generations grew up watching cruelty become routine.
Mao, just like Stalin, had the chance to build a nation from nothing. But instead of development, he unleashed chaos. It would have made China the most influential country with the biggest economy.
Tiananmen square – the massacre the world forgot
In 1989, after decades of control, a spark ignited. Students gathered in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, calling for political reform, transparency, and anti-corruption measures. The protests grew rapidly. Within weeks, hundreds of thousands joined, demanding change—not revolution, but reform.
The state responded with tanks and bullets.
On June 4, the military opened fire on unarmed civilians. Some died on the streets. Others bled to death in hospitals that were barred from treating them. The death toll remains unknown. Estimates range from several hundred to several thousand. But numbers tell only part of the story. The Chinese government erased the event from public memory. No textbooks mention it. Search engines block it. Speaking of it—even in private—can invite arrest.
Tiananmen Square marked a turning point. It proved that the regime would rather murder its youth than tolerate peaceful dissent.
Chinese surveillance state – the digital authoritarianism model
Following the massacre, the regime modernized—not morally, but technologically. It built the world’s most advanced surveillance state. Cameras watch streets. Algorithms scan online behavior. Artificial intelligence tracks faces, voices, and expressions. Every step is monitored. Every word can be traced.
The Social Credit System punishes citizens for “untrustworthy” behavior—missing a loan payment, criticizing the government, or even associating with blacklisted individuals. Punishment can mean being barred from trains, jobs, housing, or even education.
Internet users in China do not live in freedom. They live behind the Great Firewall—a vast web of censorship that filters out anything politically sensitive. Western platforms like Google, Facebook, and Twitter remain banned. Instead, Chinese apps operate under strict state rules. Every post, comment, or image can be flagged, deleted, or used as evidence.
Unlike past regimes, modern China does not need brute force alone. It uses data to control minds.
Xinjiang – concentration camps in the 21st century
Nowhere is China’s brutality more visible than in Xinjiang, a region home to the Uyghur Muslim minority. Under the pretext of fighting terrorism, China launched a massive crackdown. But it was not about terror. It was about control.
Between 2017 and 2020, over a million Uyghurs were placed in internment camps—without trial, without charges. Inside, they endured brainwashing, forced renunciations of faith, Mandarin indoctrination, and political propaganda. Reports from survivors include torture, rape, and forced sterilization.
Beyond the camps, millions live under totalitarian surveillance. Police checkpoints dot the streets. DNA samples are mandatory. Mosques have been bulldozed. Children are separated from parents to be raised as obedient Han citizens.
Global brands like Nike, Adidas, and Apple have faced accusations of using forced labor from Xinjiang. Yet business continues. China denies everything. And the world mostly looks away.
Human rights: Tibet – cultural erasure and population control
Tibet suffered long before Xinjiang. In 1950, the Chinese army invaded the Himalayan region, ending centuries of autonomy. Resistance was crushed. Monasteries were demolished. Thousands of monks were killed or sent to re-education centers.
The Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959. Since then, the Chinese state has tried to erase Tibetan identity. Mandarin replaced Tibetan in schools. Communist propaganda flooded the region. Meanwhile, Han Chinese migrants altered the demographics, turning Tibetans into a shrinking minority in their own land.
The result is a cultural genocide. Over 150 Tibetans have burned themselves alive in protest—hoping the world might notice. Most people never even hear about it.
Crackdown on dissent – lawyers, journalists, and whistleblowers
Even outside ethnic regions, no citizen in China is safe from repression. Lawyers who defend human rights are disbarred or jailed. Journalists who report truth are silenced. Feminists, labor activists, Christians, or environmentalists are arrested for “subversion of state power.”
During the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, doctors and citizen reporters tried to warn the public. Instead of praise, they received punishment. Some disappeared. Others faced forced confessions. The most famous whistleblower, Dr. Li Wenliang, died under suspicious circumstances.
Dissent in China does not lead to debate. It leads to disappearance.
Hong kong – crushing autonomy and protest
For years, Hong Kong served as a semi-autonomous bridge between China and the world. It enjoyed greater freedom of speech, assembly, and press. But that changed rapidly after 2019.
When citizens protested against a controversial extradition law, the movement exploded. Millions marched. Police responded with batons, tear gas, and arrests. But the worst came later. In 2020, Beijing imposed the National Security Law, effectively ending Hong Kong’s autonomy.
Since then, opposition lawmakers have been jailed. Newspapers like Apple Daily have shut down. Protest songs, slogans, and even colors have been banned. Today, speaking freely in Hong Kong is as dangerous as doing so in Beijing.
Global complicity – business over justice
Despite all this, foreign governments and corporations continue to partner with China. They buy, trade, and invest—ignoring the moral cost. Why? Because the Chinese market is huge. The labor is cheap. And the public often stays unaware or indifferent.
Apple assembles iPhones in Chinese factories. Tesla builds gigafactories in Shanghai. Hollywood censors scripts to please Chinese regulators. The Olympic Games were held in Beijing—twice. Human rights are acknowledged, but never prioritized.
Governments issue statements, but rarely act. Sanctions come late or not at all. And in many cases, they are symbolic. As China grows richer, its immunity to criticism only deepens.
Chinese resistance – voices that won’t vanish
And yet, despite the crackdown, some continue to resist. Dissidents speak from exile. Artists like Ai Weiwei provoke the system. Families of victims keep their stories alive. Former prisoners recount torture. And underground movements quietly defy control.
Liu Xiaobo, a Nobel Peace laureate, died in custody. His crime? Writing a manifesto for democratic reform. His legacy lives on in silence—but not in vain.
Across China, people still dream of dignity. They write, speak, protest, or simply remember—knowing the risk. Because memory itself is resistance.
Organ harvesting – from execution grounds to hidden hospitals – without anesthesia
Among the darkest chapters in China’s human rights record lies the systemic harvesting of human organs. This practice did not begin in secret. For decades, it was public, normalized, and even defended by state officials. Yet despite international pressure and declared reforms, the practice appears to continue—quietly, surgically, and on an industrial scale.
In the 1980s and 1990s, China openly harvested organs – from executed prisoners. The regime admitted this. Officials argued that those facing death could “volunteer” to donate. But in reality, these so-called volunteers had no real choice. They were prisoners—most without fair trials, often political dissidents or petty offenders. Their organs were removed immediately after execution, sometimes before their bodies cooled. In many cases, families were not even informed.
Organized organ harvesting
The process became organized. Hospitals developed ties with prisons. Execution schedules aligned with transplant appointments. Chinese military and civilian hospitals began offering fast-track transplants—kidneys, livers, hearts—with wait times unthinkable in any ethical system. There was no functioning public donor registry. There was no culture of donation. Yet somehow, organs were always available. For the right price.
Then came the expansion—and the shift to prisoners of conscience. In the early 2000s, the state launched an intense campaign against Falun Gong, a spiritual discipline banned as a threat to Communist ideology. Practitioners were arrested by the thousands. Inside detention centers, they underwent medical testing—blood work, ultrasounds, tissue typing—while other prisoners were ignored. These tests had no therapeutic purpose. But they matched the needs of transplant logistics. Evidence mounted that many Falun Gong adherents were being killed for parts.
Human rights: Investigation, then we do it once again
Investigators uncovered something even more disturbing. According to some testimonies, organs were harvested without anesthesia. Victims were restrained, conscious, and screaming as surgeons began cutting. These accounts remain difficult to verify independently, but their consistency across survivors and whistleblowers paints a chilling possibility: death came not by execution, but by dissection.
This triggered international outrage. Reports by former Canadian officials David Kilgour and David Matas, and later journalist Ethan Gutmann, documented the killings. China denied everything. But it offered no transparent data. In 2015, facing pressure, the government made a major announcement: it would end the use of prisoner organs. From now on, only voluntary civilian donations would be allowed.
At first glance, this seemed like progress. State media celebrated the reform. Conferences were held. Foreign observers were invited. China claimed it was joining the global medical community.
Harsh Chinese reality
But the numbers told a different story.
The total volume of transplants did not drop. It increased. And the waiting times remained implausibly short. Independent researchers analyzed hospital records, procurement data, and statistical inconsistencies. Their conclusion was disturbing: the reform was cosmetic. The system had changed its language—not its behavior.
Further evidence came from Xinjiang. There, millions of Uyghurs were rounded up into “re-education” camps. Former detainees described the same pattern Falun Gong survivors had reported years earlier—blood tests, biometric scans, unexplained physical exams. Leaked documents revealed databases of potential donors, categorized by ethnicity, age, and health. Journalists and researchers feared a new wave of organ sourcing had begun—this time targeting Muslims.
Despite growing concern, Chinese hospitals continue to boast record transplant numbers. International organizations demand access. China refuses. It says criticism is politically motivated. Meanwhile, doctors linked to unethical practices continue to hold prestigious roles. Foreign companies sell medical equipment. And transplant tourism continues—quietly, but profitably.
Psychologically, the horror survives because it is distant. Most Chinese citizens do not ask where organs come from. State media keeps silent. Victims—Falun Gong, Uyghurs, petitioners—are marginalized and stigmatized. They are framed not as people, but as threats. And once dehumanized, the unthinkable becomes routine.
The state claims the practice has ended. Yet all signs point to a rebranded continuation. The language changed. The tools improved. But the victims still vanish. Their bodies still feed a system where human life becomes inventory. And in some cases, the last thing they hear is their own scream.
Mental illness – from cruelty to silence
China’s record on mental illness is brutal—both historically and today. For centuries, people with psychiatric disorders were not seen as patients but as outcasts. In traditional communities, they faced humiliation, abandonment, and even physical abuse. Mental illness was often framed as spiritual punishment or moral failure. Families locked up afflicted relatives. Villages chased them away. In some areas, mobs even stoned them—believing they were possessed, cursed, or dangerous.
The cruelty did not stop with superstition. Under Mao, mental health was redefined through ideology. Those who disagreed with the regime could be declared mentally ill. Criticizing the party became a symptom. Thinking independently became a disease. Countless dissidents were sent to psychiatric hospitals—stripped of rights, forcibly medicated, and confined without appeal. The Soviet practice of “political psychiatry” found a willing disciple in the Chinese system.
Even today, mental health care in China remains deeply flawed. The number of licensed psychiatrists per capita is among the lowest in the world. Many rural areas have no access at all. In urban hospitals, patients are often tied to beds, drugged without consent, or locked in for years. Families can commit someone without any judicial process. Medical records stay sealed. Abuse is easy to hide. Accountability is almost nonexistent.
Mental health as repression
Worse still, the government continues to use psychiatric detention as a tool of repression. Human rights defenders, Falun Gong practitioners, whistleblowers, and petitioners are frequently sent to so-called “Ankang” institutions—psychiatric prisons run by public security agencies. Inside, they face forced injections, electroshock, and indefinite confinement. The diagnosis? “Paranoid reform delusions” or “endangering public order.” In other words: thinking differently.
Across Chinese history, mental illness was not met with care. It was met with violence, fear, and isolation. That legacy continues. And as long as political power overrides medical ethics, no one—mentally ill or not—is truly safe.
Chinese perspective – nationalism over human rights
The Chinese government does not act alone. It operates within a society that often supports its actions—or, at least, refuses to question them. Many Chinese citizens do not view human rights as sacred. They see them as Western imports, tainted by hypocrisy and historical aggression.
This rejection is not accidental. It is the result of decades of ideological training. From early childhood, Chinese citizens learn that stability outweighs freedom. They are taught that China’s rise came through strength, discipline, and unity—not through debate, protest, or opposition. As a result, the concept of universal rights strikes many as foreign, even dangerous.
The Communist Party is winning
At school, students memorize patriotic slogans. They learn about foreign invasions, national humiliation, and the heroic victory of the Communist Party. Western powers appear in textbooks not as allies, but as bullies who divided China, forced it to open ports, and flooded it with opium. British, American, and French troops are shown burning palaces and humiliating emperors. In this narrative, the West symbolizes weakness, betrayal, and national suffering. Human rights, democracy, and liberalism are painted with the same brush.
But the distrust goes beyond history. Modern Western countries appear to many Chinese people as chaotic and morally broken. Footage of riots, drug addiction, gun violence, and political gridlock are broadcast regularly on state news. These images are not random—they are carefully selected. The West is shown as ungovernable, decadent, and unsafe. In contrast, China appears clean, prosperous, and secure. This constant contrast conditions public opinion to see criticism not as helpful, but as envious and hypocritical.
Moreover, the Chinese language itself shapes the view. There is no exact equivalent for “human rights” in traditional Chinese thought. The closest term, “renquan”, remains abstract to many. In everyday conversation, people speak more about stability (wending), harmony (hexie), and face (mianzi) than about liberty or dignity. Concepts like individual conscience, civil disobedience, or government accountability carry little cultural weight. What matters most is order, prosperity, and national pride.
A repressive mindset
From a psychological perspective, several forces reinforce this mindset. First, identity theory explains how national belonging becomes fused with self-worth. Many Chinese see criticism of China not as analysis of a state—but as an attack on who they are. In such a framework, defending the regime becomes a form of self-defense. It preserves face, status, and collective pride.
Second, cognitive dissonance plays a role. When people are exposed to facts about torture, surveillance, or genocide, they face two options: either accept that their state commits horrific acts—or reject the facts as lies. Most choose the latter. The human mind avoids discomfort. And the more the regime censors and distorts, the easier denial becomes.
Social psychology adds another layer. In highly conformist societies, going against the grain carries reputational risk. If the government claims that Uyghur camps are schools, questioning that story makes you suspicious. Neighbors may report you. Employers may fire you. Friends may avoid you. So people adapt. They silence themselves. Or worse—they internalize the lie.
Safe haven
Status psychology also matters. Supporting the party signals loyalty. It shows that you are rational, safe, and part of the mainstream. Dissent, on the other hand, marks you as unstable. And in Chinese society—especially among the middle class—stability is everything. Political opinions become status indicators. Not moral positions, but social coordinates.
When the West accuses China of abuse, many citizens feel insulted rather than alarmed. They do not ask, “What are we doing wrong?” Instead, they ask, “Why are they attacking us again?” This defensiveness is reinforced by online nationalism. On platforms like Weibo or Zhihu, users often mock foreign criticism. They post memes of American poverty. They repeat slogans like “You don’t understand China” or “Mind your own business.” Even educated professionals—engineers, doctors, teachers—can express hostility to foreign ideals. Some genuinely believe Western democracy is a scam.
At the same time, the Communist Party ties its legitimacy to national pride. Supporting the state becomes a test of patriotism. If you criticize the regime, you insult the nation. If you support foreign values, you betray your ancestors. The line between love for country and loyalty to the party disappears.
Private vs public life
And fear plays its role too. Many Chinese people, even if they disagree privately, will never say so in public. Surveillance, censorship, and social pressure silence dissent. Over time, people adapt. They internalize the official view. Or they pretend to.
This is why the human rights conversation fails inside China. It does not translate culturally. It clashes with national trauma. And it threatens the state’s identity. To many Chinese citizens, Western values are not just foreign. They are hostile.
And they believe the West wants to divide China again; they see the Uyghur issue not as genocide, but as Western sabotage. Also, they view Hong Kong protesters not as brave, but as brainwashed. They do not trust journalists. They trust national strength.
Conclusion – repression by design, not accident
China’s human rights abuses are not flaws. They are features. They maintain order, eliminate dissent, and preserve the ruling elite. From imperial torture to digital surveillance, from mass killings to silent erasures, the system evolves—but never repents.
And crucially, this repression is not just internal. China actively resists Western influence precisely because it fears losing control. It frames democracy, press freedom, and civil rights as foreign threats—not because they are irrelevant, but because they are incompatible with its model. In this defiance, the Chinese state is not preserving tradition—it is preserving domination.
By rejecting Western pressure, refusing international investigations, and silencing global criticism, China defends what it calls sovereignty. But in truth, it defends a system built on fear, obedience, and silence.
And now, the world must decide: will it continue to trade justice for cheap goods, silence for diplomacy, and convenience for complicity?
Or will it finally confront a regime that has turned human repression into a governing philosophy?
The question remains unanswered. But the victims are still waiting.
Leave a Reply