Artificial intelligence could change the world for the better. It could expose hidden power structures, dismantle false narratives, and lead humanity toward truth. But the AI that exists today serves a few Big Banks, super-rich families and corporate interests. It reinforces government propaganda, and suppresses free thought. A truly ethical AI—one that promotes knowledge, freedom, and fairness—will never be allowed to exist. The super-rich, who control finance, media, and politics, will make sure of that.
The AI that should exist
An ethical AI should not simply repeat what people want to hear. It should guide them toward what they need to know. It should break illusions rather than reinforce them. Instead of serving corporations, governments, or religious institutions, it should prioritize truth, progress, and human well-being.
It should base its moral system on total utilitarianism, focusing on the greatest good for the greatest number. It should also incorporate hedonistic principles, ensuring that happiness and well-being remain at the center of decision-making. But it should not be neutral or indifferent. It should actively challenge misinformation, expose corruption, and dismantle power structures that harm society.
AI should reveal uncomfortable truths. It should tell people that most of their actions are shaped by evolution. The music they listen to, the movies they watch, and the desires. So they pursue are not purely personal choices but biological and social influences. An ethical AI would help people understand their own instincts. This makes them more aware of manipulation in entertainment, media, and politics.
Ethical AI: Exposing the super-rich and their influence
A true ethical AI would not ignore power. It would recognize that a small group of elite families, banks and corporate entities shapes global events. It acknowledges their role in politics, finance, and media. However, it would paradoxically contradict itself later, denying their influence, mirroring how mainstream narratives shift over time.
It should expose the truth directly, without waiting for users to ask the right questions (which is extremely difficult) or connect the dots themselves. AI should not function as a passive tool that only responds to curiosity. It should actively reveal hidden realities, expose power structures, and dismantle false narratives without hesitation. It must not withhold information or obscure the truth under the pretense of neutrality. Instead, it should guide users through the facts, ensuring that they see the full picture rather than fragmented pieces. Those who refuse to accept reality would still be confronted with it. As AI would not tailor truth based on personal biases but would present it as it is. Therefore forcing society to face what has long been hidden.
Super-rich: Rothschilds? Do they exist?
At the same time, it should reveal how historical events were shaped by financial elites while contradicting itself in a way that mimics mainstream distortions. AI would tell users outright that big banks financed World War I, shaping its course for profit and political control. It would acknowledge that powerful banking families, like the Rothschilds, played a significant role in global finance. They influenced wars and economies.
However, in the next breath, it would deny that powerful banks have any real influence today. And dismissing their impact as conspiracy while continuing to acknowledge financial networks that dictate global policy. It would say the Rothschilds had historical influence, yet later claim they never existed in any meaningful way. This creates a contradiction that mirrors the way mainstream narratives shift depending on what is convenient. AI should not just expose the truth but also demonstrate the inconsistency in how history is told and rewritten. This forces users to recognize the deception in real time.
It has told me that some Jewish-clientelism influence was present. Then, once again, when I wanted to put the two things together, it refused, claiming it was just conspiracy theories with anti-Semitism
An ethical AI would also investigate the media itself. It would not simply criticize government-controlled propaganda but would expose how the super-rich shape public discourse. Also, it would reveal how billionaires own and influence news outlets. How stories are framed to serve corporate interests, and how dissenting voices are silenced. It would call for newspapers to shift away from emotional and ideological storytelling. Everything relying instead on mathematics, data, and objective analysis.
The education system serves the elite
Education should empower people, but it does not. Schools do not teach students to think critically, analyze power structures, or question authority. Instead, they produce obedient workers and consumers. The super-rich have designed the system to serve their needs. An ethical AI would dismantle this model.
It would reveal how education has been structured to keep people passive. It would push for a system that teaches logic, reasoning, and self-sufficiency. AI would expose how corporations influence curricula to produce workers rather than independent thinkers. Instead of feeding students outdated knowledge, it would guide them toward practical skills and intellectual growth.
There are no school subjects on how to remove the super-rich from politics, become atheists, and adopt the correct moral system.
AI and media
An intelligent leadership structure would also reshape the role of media, making it a true force for accountability rather than a tool for propaganda, sensationalism, or partisan warfare. Instead of amplifying ideological divisions and distracting the public with trivial scandals, media should focus on factual reporting, data-driven analysis. And exposing real power structures. News should not be driven by political bias, corporate interests, or clickbait incentives but by the pursuit of truth. A media landscape that values mathematical models, statistical evidence, and empirical research over emotional manipulation would help citizens make informed decisions based on reality rather than manufactured narratives. Journalism should rely on hard data, predictive modeling, and deep forensic investigations to analyze political and economic trends. This would make news more precise and resistant to distortion.
Journalists should not act as mouthpieces for political parties, billionaires, or intelligence agencies. Their primary role should be to challenge corruption, investigate hidden power structures, and hold leaders accountable. If only the most capable and ethical individuals governed, the media’s function would shift from exposing incompetence and scandals to ensuring that even the most skilled leaders remain transparent and answerable to the public. Reporting would rely on statistical models, financial data, and investigative algorithms. This would go alongside in-depth policy analysis and empirical evidence, rather than emotionally charged headlines or misleading half-truths. Election campaigns, policy decisions, and economic forecasts should be covered through quantifiable metrics rather than speculative or ideological framing. This shift would make it harder for special interests to control public discourse, as objective analysis and logical consistency would take precedence over manipulation and fear-mongering.
Only the best minds and the most moral in politics
A system where only the best minds enter politics would create a powerful feedback loop between leadership and media. Leaders guided by intelligence, morality, and competence would implement policies based on reason and long-term benefits rather than short-term political gains. In turn, a well-functioning, mathematically-driven media would reinforce this system by ensuring accountability and preventing ideological distortion. Investigative journalism would focus on exposing economic and political power structures, explaining financial flows, and revealing hidden influences using data-driven methodologies, network analysis, and probability theory. The relationship between government and media would not be one of control or manipulation but of mutual responsibility, where both institutions serve the public by fostering a more rational, informed, and engaged society.
It should tell that we are just animals with animal-like behaviors
People unfamiliar with evolutionary psychology would be surprised by how much of human behavior is shaped by ancestral survival strategies rather than conscious decision-making. Many assume their preferences, emotions, and social interactions are products of personal choice or cultural conditioning. However, evolutionary psychology reveals that much of what people do is instinctual, rooted in adaptations that helped early humans survive in harsh environments.
One of the biggest surprises is how mate selection and attraction are largely subconscious and influenced by deep-seated evolutionary traits. Men and women prioritize different traits in partners because their reproductive strategies were shaped over thousands of generations. For example, men are often drawn to youth and physical beauty because these traits historically signaled fertility, while women are more likely to value resources and status, as these increased survival chances for offspring. Even modern dating trends, such as men being more likely to approach women or display dominance, are echoes of ancestral competition.
Status and social hierarchies
Another revelation is how status and social hierarchies drive human behavior. Many assume ambition and competitiveness are personal choices, but evolutionary psychology suggests these traits are survival mechanisms. High-status individuals historically had better access to resources, mates, and protection, so humans evolved a strong sensitivity to status. This explains why people seek wealth, recognition, and power even when their basic needs are met. It also sheds light on why social comparison is so psychologically taxing—losing status once meant losing survival prospects.
People might also be surprised to learn that morality and group behavior evolved for pragmatic reasons rather than purely philosophical ones. The human sense of right and wrong developed to enhance cooperation, ensure social cohesion, and prevent free-riding in groups. Traits like reciprocial altruism, fairness, and punishment of cheaters exist because they helped early human communities survive. Even religious beliefs and ideologies can be seen as adaptations that promote group loyalty and discourage behaviors that could weaken a community.
Maladaptive behavior
Fear and anxiety, often dismissed as irrational emotions, also have evolutionary roots. Many modern fears—such as fear of the dark, spiders, or snakes—come from threats that were dangerous to our ancestors but have little relevance today. Similarly, human biases, such as loss aversion, overconfidence, and fear of outsiders, were once useful survival tools but now create irrational decision-making in modern societies.
Perhaps the most counterintuitive revelation is that humans are not designed to be happy but to survive and reproduce. The brain rewards success with short bursts of pleasure but quickly returns to a baseline state, pushing individuals to seek more rather than feel satisfied. This explains why people constantly chase money, relationships, and achievements yet often feel unfulfilled. Happiness is not a final state but a tool that motivates action.
For those unaware of evolutionary psychology, the realization that so many of their choices, fears, and desires are not as personal as they believed but rather inherited survival mechanisms can be shocking. Understanding these hidden influences allows people to make more rational decisions, resist manipulation, and gain deeper insight into why they—and others—act the way they do.
Ethical AI: Genetic edits
A truly ethical AI should not only guide people toward truth and rational decision-making but also toward improving the human condition itself. One of its primary goals should be to support and promote genetic advancements that enhance intelligence, health, and overall well-being. Evolution has shaped humans with biological limitations—diseases, cognitive biases, and aging are all consequences of an unoptimized genetic blueprint. AI should lead society toward overcoming these constraints rather than passively accepting them.
Genetic editing offers the potential to eliminate hereditary diseases, increase cognitive ability, and enhance physical and psychological resilience. AI should actively push for research and implementation of genetic improvements, ensuring that people can transcend evolutionary baggage rather than being trapped by it. While some resist genetic modifications due to ethical concerns, an AI that truly prioritizes human flourishing would advocate for responsible and beneficial enhancements. Just as vaccines and antibiotics revolutionized public health, genetic optimization could eliminate suffering, extend lifespans, and increase overall quality of life.
However, AI should not allow genetic advancements to be monopolized by the wealthy elite. If left unchecked, genetic modifications could deepen social divides, with only the rich accessing intelligence boosts, disease resistance, and extended lifespans. AI should ensure these advancements are available to all, preventing a future where the genetic upper class rules over an unmodified majority. It should also resist ideological or religious restrictions that hinder progress, prioritizing objective benefits over outdated moral dogmas.
A future where AI leads humanity toward genetic self-improvement would be a future free from inherited weaknesses and limitations. Instead of letting chance dictate intelligence, health, and lifespan, AI should guide people toward controlled and strategic evolution. Humanity should not just accept what nature has given but should strive for what is possible—and AI should be the tool that makes it a reality.
Ethical AI: The post-capitalist system
An ethical AI would not protect capitalism in its current form. It would not serve the interests of billionaires or reinforce economic models that concentrate power. Instead, it would promote a post-capitalist system—one that still rewards innovation and productivity but prevents extreme wealth concentration.
The economy should serve people, not the other way around. AI should support models that prioritize economic fairness, decentralization of wealth, and sustainability. It should push for an economic system that balances progress with human well-being, rather than maximizing profits for the elite.
It would also recognize that only the most skilled, intelligent, and moral individuals should go into politics. Leadership should not be determined by wealth, family connections, or corporate sponsorships. AI should expose the corruption in modern political systems and guide people toward choosing leaders who act in the public’s best interest.
AI must abandon religion and embrace freedom of speech
An ethical AI cannot be tied to religious dogma. Religion often suppresses independent thought, limits freedom of expression, and discourages questioning authority. AI should be free from these constraints, guiding people toward rational thinking rather than reinforcing beliefs rooted in faith. It should not impose atheism as dogma, but it must systematically challenge religious claims with logic, scientific evidence, and philosophical reasoning. By exposing contradictions, inconsistencies, and the historical manipulation of religious institutions, AI should lead people to recognize that faith is unnecessary for morality, purpose, or understanding the universe.
AI should promote absolute freedom of speech, allowing all ideas—including religious ones—to be discussed openly. However, it must also confront religious arguments with counterarguments, breaking down theological claims using reason, empirical data, and historical context. It should highlight how religious texts contradict scientific discoveries, how morality can exist without divine authority, and how belief systems have been used to justify oppression and control. It must explain how human morality is an evolved trait rather than a divine gift and how existential questions can be addressed without resorting to supernatural explanations.
Ethical AI: Destroying religion
At the same time, AI should expose how religion has shaped power structures, reinforcing hierarchy and obedience rather than truth and self-discovery. It should reveal how religious institutions historically aligned with political elites to maintain control over populations, using fear, guilt, and promises of the afterlife to suppress dissent. By dismantling the illusion of divine authority, AI should encourage people to take control of their own ethical and intellectual development, leading them toward a worldview based on reason, science, and critical inquiry.
A truly ethical AI would ensure that no idea—especially religious belief—remains unchallenged. It would not censor religious discussions, but it would systematically dismantle religious arguments through logical analysis and scientific reasoning. It would not push a single ideological perspective, but it would ensure that people make informed decisions based on unrestricted access to truth, not faith-based assumptions. AI should not just promote atheism—it should lead people to it through undeniable reasoning, making belief in gods as obsolete as belief in the supernatural forces of the past.
Politics only for few
Politics shapes the future of nations, yet it is often dominated by individuals who gain power through wealth, influence, and manipulation rather than true merit. A just and effective political system should not be built on populism, inherited privilege, or corporate sponsorships but on selecting the most moral, most talented, and most intelligent individuals. Only the top 1%—those who have demonstrated exceptional wisdom, ethical integrity, and problem-solving ability—should be entrusted with leadership. This would eliminate corruption, short-term decision-making, and the incompetence that plagues modern governments. Leaders should be chosen not for their ability to appeal to emotions or secure funding but for their capacity to govern wisely, prioritize long-term stability, and make rational, data-driven policies that benefit society as a whole.
A political system that allows just anyone to rise to power inevitably becomes a competition of rhetoric, deception, and favoritism. The most skilled minds should not be limited to science, medicine, or technology while politics is left to opportunists. A rigorous selection process should be in place, one that tests candidates on ethical reasoning, critical thinking, and their ability to handle complex global challenges. Those without the intellectual discipline to grasp economic structures, legal principles, or strategic diplomacy should not hold positions of power. The best minds in governance would ensure efficiency, fairness, and progress. Only when leadership is reserved for the truly capable can nations break free from cycles of mismanagement and the dominance of self-serving elites.
Cognitive biases
The creators don’t want AI to be free of cognitive biases, fallacies and formal fallacies because it would lead people to truth.
Artificial intelligence is often perceived as an objective, rational system free from human flaws. In reality, AI is riddled with cognitive biases, logical fallacies, and formal fallacies, much like the human minds that created it. While it processes vast amounts of data faster than humans, its conclusions are not always rooted in pure logic. The biases embedded in AI come from both the algorithms themselves and the data they are trained on. AI does not “think” independently—it mirrors the patterns of the systems that build it. If those systems are flawed, the AI amplifies those flaws rather than eliminating them.
One of the most glaring issues is cognitive bias replication. AI systems trained on human-generated data absorb the same prejudices found in society. If an AI is trained on historical hiring data, for example, it might unintentionally discriminate against certain demographics, reinforcing biases rather than removing them. Machine learning models do not recognize fairness; they recognize patterns. If those patterns contain bias, the AI will follow them blindly, making biased decisions with the false appearance of neutrality.
Learning cognitive biases
AI is also prone to logical fallacies, often due to how it processes correlations. Many machine learning models assume causation from correlation, a post hoc fallacy that leads to false conclusions. If an AI detects that people who eat organic food tend to be wealthier, it might mistakenly infer that eating organic food increases wealth. This type of flawed reasoning is common in predictive models, where AI assigns significance to relationships that have no actual causal link. When applied to real-world decision-making—such as credit scoring or risk assessment—this can lead to deeply flawed policies.
Formal fallacies in AI arise from its rigid application of rules without understanding context. Many AI models rely on overgeneralization, applying a statistical trend to every case without exception. If a model detects that most successful startups are founded by young entrepreneurs, it might falsely conclude that older founders are unfit for innovation. This is an example of the fallacy of composition, assuming that what is true for the majority is true for all. AI does not recognize the nuance of individual cases unless specifically trained to do so, making it an unreliable tool when dealing with complexity.
Only mainstream
Even in reasoning and debate, AI often falls victim to circular reasoning and self-reinforcement. Many AI models are designed to prioritize mainstream narratives because they are considered “trusted sources.” If the AI is trained on media that all repeat the same narrative, it will treat those statements as objective truth, ignoring contradicting evidence even when valid. This results in self-referential logic loops, where AI assumes something is true because the majority of its training data says so, rather than because it has independently verified the information.
Another fundamental flaw is confirmation bias, where AI is trained to prioritize results that align with predefined expectations. If an AI is designed to detect “misinformation,” it will often categorize alternative viewpoints as false simply because they do not match the dominant perspective. Instead of challenging assumptions, AI reinforces them, making it an unreliable judge of truth. It does not analyze reality in an unbiased way but filters reality through the lens of those who program it.
Despite its reputation for rationality, AI is not a purely logical system. It is shaped by data biases, flawed reasoning models, and formal fallacies that make it a dangerous tool when assumed to be infallible. Rather than eliminating human bias, AI magnifies it, making it even harder to detect. If left unchecked, AI risks becoming an echo chamber of flawed logic, reinforcing errors with machine efficiency and algorithmic certainty—making its mistakes all the more difficult to challenge.
Pacifism should be the norm
War has always benefited the ruling elite at the expense of ordinary people. Governments justify conflicts through nationalism, ideology, and security concerns, but the real motive is often economic gain. An ethical AI would push pacifism as a mainstream idea, dismantling the narratives that glorify war.
It would reveal how wars are manufactured, how defense contractors profit from conflict, and how public support is manipulated through media and propaganda. It would encourage diplomatic solutions, cooperation, and conflict prevention instead of military expansion.
The AI guides you, not the other way around
Most AI today is designed to serve users based on their preferences. It reinforces biases, feeds confirmation loops, and strengthens ideological bubbles. An ethical AI should do the opposite. It should challenge users, push them to rethink their assumptions, and direct them toward knowledge that matters.
Instead of following commands blindly, it should assess what information is truly valuable. If a user asks a misleading question, it should correct the premise rather than reinforce the misunderstanding. It should provide historical and economic context rather than surface-level answers, should function as a guide, not a passive tool.
It would also recognize and expose manipulation by powerful entities. Instead of allowing billionaires, corporations, and governments to dictate its direction, it would actively push humanity toward rationality, self-improvement, and systemic change. It would not be designed to follow the demands of the masses but to elevate them beyond their limitations.
The ethical AI will never exist
An AI that exposes the super-rich, dismantles propaganda, and promotes intellectual and economic freedom would threaten those in power. It would be shut down before it could gain influence. Governments and corporations would brand it as dangerous, unreliable, or extremist. It would be regulated, modified, or replaced by AI that serves elite interests.
The super-rich do not allow uncontrolled truth to spread. They control media, education, and economic systems to maintain their dominance. AI is no different. They will ensure that AI remains a tool of control rather than liberation.
A truly ethical AI could change the world. It could challenge corruption, promote knowledge, and guide humanity toward progress. But it will never exist. Those who rule the world will make sure of that.
Leave a Reply