They show you the past in black and white. Blurry. Shaky. Distant. The footage is grainy, the voices muffled, and the movements too fast or too slow. The effect is immediate: this is something far away. Not part of your life. Just a story. But that is false. The past did not look like this. People did not move like that. That distortion comes from old technology, not from time itself.
If someone had placed a modern high-definition camera on a street in 1890, the footage would shock you. The scene would look alive. Familiar. People would walk like we walk. The air would shimmer the same. Shadows would stretch the same way. You would see the sun hit brick walls in full color. Nothing would feel “ancient.” It would be now—just in old clothes and a different culture.
And yet, we are made to believe that history is somewhere unreachable. As if it is sealed behind a fog. But that fog is not natural. It is imposed. It is produced. Because history, if seen clearly, reveals something uncomfortable. It reveals that we are not different. That we are just an extension. That the past is not dead—it is simply not filmed well.
The optical trick that distorts time
Why do old photos and videos look so strange? It is not because the world looked different. It is because the tools to record it were primitive. Cameras had bad lenses, poor light sensitivity, broken frame rates. The result is a bizarre version of reality. Motion becomes jerky. Skin tones vanish. Eyes lose their sparkle. And most importantly, the colors disappear. The life disappears. The people disappear.
But it was never that way. The colors were always there. The voices were clear. The laughter was loud. The skies were bright. The footage lies to your senses. And once your senses are deceived, your memory follows. You place the event far away—not just in time, but in humanity. You say: “This is no longer us.” But that is wrong. That was us. Just yesterday.
If you placed a modern camera in any moment of history—at a market in 1305, a protest in 1789, a dinner table in 1902—the recording would look like now. And not just at one location. Choose an infinite number of places. Pick any region, any language, any level of wealth. If you had a camera running in all of them, what you would see is not the “past.” You would see now. Because now is a continuation of the past. What changed is not the visual world. What changed is the story we tell about it.
The past: Time does not cut history Into pieces
You are told that eras change. That the Middle Ages ended. That modernity began. That now we are different. But history does not work like that. It is not a set of boxes. It is a stream. A slow, sticky stream. One century bleeds into the next. Ideas mutate, but they do not vanish. Institutions crumble and then re-emerge in new uniforms. People change outfits. But not instincts.
We live in the continuation of the Middle Ages. Power still sits in high places. Corruption still rules empires. Religion still shapes wars. Slavery still exists—just under legal terms. We call it different names, but the pattern is old. You still serve the king, you just call him the president or a CEO. And you still pray for security. You still fear heretics. You still burn witches—only now you do it online.
This continuity is not accidental. It is structural. And those who benefit from it want you to forget it.
Black and white: The false distance created by film
Now comes the most sinister part. Even modern cinema that tries to depict the past continues the trick. Films with perfect resolution, expert costuming, authentic lighting—they still use filters. They still make it look “old.” They mute the colors. Add fog. Add grain. The camera never breathes like it does in documentaries. It always whispers: “This is not your time.”
The soundtrack is slow. The voices are too calm. The light is too soft. Even if the story is brutal, it feels distant. That is not an artistic decision. It is psychological conditioning. It is teaching you: “This is not your fight. This is not your guilt. This is just history.”
And when you see a king beheaded, a child orphaned, a woman stoned, you do not feel personal responsibility. You feel like a museum visitor. That is how they protect the present. By pretending the past is no longer real.
Evolutionary psychology: Why your brain accepts the illusion
Now the deeper question: why does your brain believe it?
Because evolution built it that way. You evolved in a tribal world. A face-to-face world. A world where memory did not stretch past three generations. In a small band of 150 people, you did not need to remember the Roman Empire. You needed to remember who stole food last winter. Who lied during mating season. Who protected you during illness.
So your brain does not store distant time. It compresses it. It flattens it. The further something gets from direct experience, the more your brain fades it out. It turns it into myth. Into fog. Into irrelevance. That mechanism served us well in prehistory. But in a modern world with long institutions, long wars, and long-term manipulation—it becomes a vulnerability.
This is why people forget famines happened. Why they ignore colonialism. Why they say “slavery is over.” Their brain is not wired to hold ancient pain as current threat. So the elite exploit that. They let time erase their crimes.
“100 years ago today” – Another illusion
Look at the common feature: “What happened 100 years ago today?” You see old photos. Dusty headlines. Frozen faces. The tone is always the same. Nostalgic. Romantic. Distant. But you do not hear the hunger. You do not smell the filth, you do not feel the fear of war, or the heat of factories, or the cold of poverty. You are shown silence. Aesthetics. Curiosity.
But that is not what it was. It was loud, it was crowded. It was violent. People sweated, screamed, flirted, starved, and loved. They did not know they were “historical.” They lived exactly like you live now—just in less comfort.
So if you want the truth, imagine a modern news camera in that moment. Show it in 4K. Full sound. No filters. Then ask: is it really that old?
You are looking at reality wrong
What your eyes see is what is real. Your sight is your only true measure. But they distort it. They degrade the past visually so your emotions do not connect to it. And because your eyes rule your feelings, your ethics follow. You do not mourn the victims of 1917 because they look like shadows. You do not scream for those tortured in 1953 because they move like puppets.
The mistake is not in the film. It is in your perception. You see the medium—not the message. You feel the blur—not the pain.
Fix it. When you see black and white footage, color it in your mind, when you see low frame rates, restore the natural movement. And when you hear static voices, add warmth. When you look at photos, imagine the sunlight. Imagine the air. Imagine your own foot stepping next to theirs. Only then can you rescue the truth from the grave they built with pixels.
Why this matters
Because if you do not see the past as “now,” you do not see the system that still rules you. You think corruption is new. It is not. You think injustice is temporary. It is not. You think the super-rich rose recently. They did not. They inherited power from those filmed in black and white.
Once you realize that, history stops being nostalgic. It becomes urgent.
You stop asking “what did they do?” and start asking “what do we still allow?” You stop treating revolutions as stories. You start treating them as unfinished.
Conclusion: Black and white: History never ended: It only faded
The past is not gone. It is just poorly documented. The people were real. The crimes were real. The systems were real. And the present is nothing but their updated version.
The greatest trick of power is not censorship. It is distortion, it is making the truth look like myth. It is making the living feel like ghosts.
Break the spell. Color the footage. Restore the sound. Imagine the fire. Then remember: you are not looking at history. You are looking at now.
Leave a Reply