Those who know what reality is sometimes exhibit behavior that is very violent at its core. The super-rich who exert control over our politicians are a historic injustice. However, shooting the super-rich like tsar? No way! We are not the same.
Resorting to violence against the evidence-based existence of the super-rich who control this planet is neither vital nor humane. I admired Václav Havel as a politician, yet detested him as a politician. When the violent tendencies after the Velvet Revolution took place, some people wanted to be just like the communists and execute, imprison, and maybe torture those communists who were considered the most prominent.
The late Václav Havel was against it and advocated the phrase: “We are not like them!” So it same goes with the super-rich and shooting them.
How to prove they exist?
I often find it funny that the least intellectually able believe there are some organized patron-client hidden networks based on the amount of assets they have. Those average intelligent are not believers. Those highly intellectually gifted denounce the claims as conspiracy theories and those well-read are die-hard believers.
But what matters the most are not theories, but evidence-based claims. There are many newspaper pieces, evidence-based literature, and logical core proving there really are well-connected power networks.
There was huge capital accumulation during the 19th century, and so-called “robber barons” gained significant wealth. They were (and are) basically political entrepreneurs. Their wealth is so enormous that they make whole families that are interlinked.
As Nomi Prins writes in her book “All the Presidents’ Bankers: The Hidden Alliances that Drive American Power” regarding Franklin Delano Roosevelt: “The Morgans (the richest), Rockefellers, Astors, and Vanderbilts were all friends or neighbors of FDR.”
These families control the big banks and exert significant influence on the judiciary, executive, and legislative power. You can prove their influence by letters the bankers were writing to US presidents (see Nomi Prins’ book) or old newspaper articles (see the book by Lundberg).
John D. Rockefeller owned 418 billion dollars (2019 dollars; inflation-adjusted). According to nowadays Forbes the whole Rockefeller family owned only 11 billion dollars in 2017. And they say capitalism multiplies the wealth of the super-rich by astounding numbers.
I must reiterate that shooting the super-rich or any kind even a slight trace of violence against them is insupportable.
I highly recommend reading “America’s 60 Families” (by Ferdinand Lundberg) and “All the Presidents’ Bankers: The Hidden Alliances that Drive American Power” (by Nomi Prins).
How to know they have power and are they Illuminati?
And are the families Illuminati? Yes, they are; Henry Ford was also a member of the Freemasons. In 1940, he said that the Freemasons were the best for the balance of power in the United States.
You should note that former Czech president Václav Klaus admitted their existence. It same goes with Pope Francis.
They completely destroy the US political system (they are damaging the political process with their infinite feuds) to the citizens’ detriment. Without the lobbyists and the super-rich, the air would be so fresh. Brand new and colossal reforms would take place.
Why a politician cannot freely do what he or she desires? You may object inside the party humane feuds. Someone is more powerful than another. But these are the rich who destroy it. Still, we have no right to shoot the super-rich or to do any violence against them.
A history lesson
The Russian Revolution of 1917 was a culmination of various factors, including widespread discontent among the Russian people due to economic hardship, social inequality, and the government’s mishandling of events such as World War I and the February Revolution.
The February Revolution of 1917 led to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II, ending centuries of Romanov rule. Following this, power initially shifted to a provisional government, which struggled to maintain control amidst growing revolutionary fervor. Eventually, the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, seized power in the October Revolution later that year.
Nicholas II and his family were placed under house arrest. In July 1918, amid fears that the anti-Bolshevik forces advancing on the city might liberate the Romanovs and restore the monarchy, the Bolshevik leadership decided to execute the Tsar and his family.
Why does the possibility of shooting the super-rich and connection to the tsar make sense?
The Russian tsar was a really awful person. He ruled autocratically, was inept, practiced violence daily, and suppressed all the dissent. But his crimes were a weak tea if we compare it to what the Bolsheviks did.
He was the worst of the worst. Not only a political rival but an ideological antagonistic person.
But where is the connection? What the super-rich are practicing on us are awful crimes – criminal economic system, mass media brainwashing, economic predatory behavior, wrong moral system, their wars (when common citizens are dying), and no family support (fewer children born due to low natality).
The super-rich have no problem exterminating us, and sending us to their own (due to power struggles and economic profits) wars, but we are not like them.
How to get rid of them non-violently
I have to reiterate no such thing as violence should ever occur. We should make entirely paid media without any backward influence controlling who controls the politicians from behind (and other media). Special investigation teams would prevent a trio which consists of a politician (face), crook (stealing the funds), and lobbyist (they are connected to the super-rich) from damaging the political process.
Political education (even if something with a political background exists) should take place from the first level of the educational system.
If some improving people by genetic means occurs and people an augmentation of people by AI takes place, newspapers must be in mathematics, statistics, no fairy-tale we are inclined to due to our
Shooting the super-rich as not an option. Do they deserve punishment?
Neither shooting the super-rich is absolutely inexcusable, nor any form of violence is.
Bolsheviks killed the tsarist family because they feared they could come back and claim power.
If citizens cease to be the sheep and become real citizens it would be them that claim the power, so no coming back of the super-rich is an option.
I will make you angry, but I wouldn’t harm them by any reprisal, no jail time whatsoever.
What to do with their unimaginable wealth?
You may have an IQ of 150+ and still struggle to get a grasp of how obscenely rich the families are.
The US GDP was 25.44 trillion dollars in 2022. So multiply it by 10 (sic) at least!
I don’t know what an economic system we should have, yet I am entirely sure the wealth shouldn’t be in the hands of the super-rich.
So having a better society highly depends on the fact who rules us. And if we make the face the opposition, only non-violent means should be allowed.
Leave a Reply