People often search for simple answers. They blame the dictator, they blame the extremist. They blame the foreigner. Yet the truth behind wars is far from simple. It is layered, invisible, and deeply structural. Wars do not erupt randomly. Rather, they emerge from calculated decisions, quiet alliances, and systems designed to reward conflict. And because the machinery behind them remains intact, they repeat.
To grasp the full picture, we must look beyond leaders. We must examine the forces behind them—and those beneath them—who sustain the entire system. Only then can we understand how the war machine truly functions.
Capital wars: The silent fight of shadow groups
At the highest level, wars begin long before the battlefield. They start where capital competes. Behind the political façade lies a world of rival financial blocs. These are not official governments or ministries. Instead, they are dynastic families, investment giants, and power patrons who operate without elections or public accountability.
These shadow groups battle over oil, data cables, vaccine markets, shipping lanes, and global credit structures. They do not address the public. Rather, they influence advisers, fund research, and shape agendas through elite retreats. By financing media outlets and lobbying operations, they quietly move national strategies into alignment with their private goals. Their fingerprints rarely appear in official decisions, but their influence is everywhere.
Importantly, these factions do not act as a monolith. One dynasty may profit from fossil fuels, another from clean tech. One favors NATO expansion, another benefits from multipolar disruption. Yet all agree on one principle: capital must grow. And whenever diplomacy threatens that growth, war becomes not only acceptable—but logical.
Intranational patron-client networks: The local engines of war
Within nations, elites do not operate in isolation. They form dense webs of patronage. Each node in this network serves another. Politicians owe their rise to donors. Regulators depend on ministries. Ministries receive funding from old-money institutions. Corporate lobbyists lubricate the entire machine.
Consequently, policy reflects loyalty, not public good. It serves elite coordination more than collective need. Defense budgets swell, even when hospitals crumble. Surveillance expands, even as schools decline. Military industries thrive, even while civil infrastructure deteriorates.
Once war enters the conversation, these networks respond with astonishing speed. War means deals. It means urgency. War justifies secrecy. It delivers contracts, displaces competitors, and grants new powers.
Moreover, war stifles dissent. While peace invites scrutiny, war demands obedience. Anyone who questions the conflict is labeled disloyal. In this way, domestic elite networks preserve their hierarchy by wrapping themselves in the flag.
Politicians: The public face of private interests
Voters believe elections grant representation. They assume politicians reflect the public will. But political careers do not begin at the ballot box. They begin in donor meetings, consulting rooms, and corporate retreats.
To win power, politicians must first appeal to capital. They learn early which narratives unlock funding. They practice talking points that calm markets and impress handlers. Over time, they stop mimicking elite views—they internalize them. Familiarity becomes conviction. What once was strategy becomes belief.
As a result, many politicians no longer pretend to serve capital. They do so naturally. They speak of preemptive strikes, national strength, and red lines. Not because they are pressured—but because they believe. Habit becomes ideology. What began as calculated performance evolves into worldview.
Across parties and nations, political figures converge on similar stances. Even when their labels differ, their priorities align. Beneath their rhetoric lies silent fidelity to the architects of their ascent. Every major party contains factions that differ on symbols, but not on systems.
Each campaign donation demands reciprocity; each media alliance comes with strings. Each party endorsement ensures conformity. So while the politician smiles on television, the real voice speaks from behind the curtain.
Citizens: The ultimate but powerless majority
Paradoxically, citizens both empower and suffer from war. They provide soldiers. They pay taxes, they elect leaders. Yet they rarely direct outcomes. Even when democratic in name, modern systems concentrate decision-making power far from ordinary people.
This paradox stems from a design flaw. The modern state was not built for citizen oversight. It was built for consent. Citizens cannot stop a military strike. They cannot access secret deals. They cannot audit defense spending. Even public hearings are often symbolic.
In addition, humans evolved for tribal leadership, not complex bureaucracies. In ancestral societies, leaders were visible and replaceable. Today, citizens judge candidates through filtered ads and theatrical debates. Their instincts misfire in a system too vast to perceive.
As fear spreads and nationalism surges, people revert to loyalty. They support flags over facts. And they seek protection, not precision. They endorse aggression in the name of safety. Therefore, even good intentions collapse under psychological pressure.
Evolutionary psychology: Politics beyond human capacity
This dissonance is not accidental. Political operatives exploit it. They weaponize instinct, they simplify threats. And they polarize debates. They promise safety through strength. Complexity is treated as weakness. Nuance becomes treason.
By appealing to ancient fears—of betrayal, invasion, humiliation—they stir primitive loyalties. These loyalties override reasoning. They dull empathy. They heighten urgency. And they push citizens to support conflict without comprehension.
War narratives succeed because they bypass logic. They awaken identity, they demand allegiance. They activate pride. This emotional circuitry, once useful for survival, becomes dangerous when manipulated by governments or media empires.
Human politics was suitable for hunter-gathering groups, not countries like the USA.
But modern wars are not tribal skirmishes. They are transcontinental disasters. They destroy millions. And yet, they are driven by instincts forged for survival in the jungle.
Nationalism: The glue that traps the masses
Every major war feeds on nationalism. It turns strangers into comrades. And it turns dissenters into traitors. It erases nuance with myth. It bonds the population to the state—not out of reason, but through emotion.
Through nationalism, poor citizens defend rich dynasties. They protect empires that ignore them. They kill others they never met—for symbols they barely understand. The more abstract the threat, the more intense the loyalty.
Nationalism is not organic. It is taught. And it is reinforced. It is embedded in education, culture, and sport. Over time, it becomes indistinguishable from identity. Once fused with ego, it becomes immune to critique. Questioning the nation becomes self-betrayal.
Thus, nationalism does not just fuel war. It blinds people to its cause, it converts exploitation into virtue. And it disguises manipulation as loyalty. It transforms citizens into instruments of elite strategy.
What if? A system without war
Imagine a system designed to prevent war, not manage it. A world where:
- Nationalism holds no sacred status.
- Politicians face public scrutiny in real time.
- Digital platforms empower mass vetoes on military action.
- Media funding is transparent and decentralized.
- Electoral systems sever dependency on elite money.
Such a world would still face tension. Yet without secrecy, manipulation, and tribal myths, war would lose its teeth. It would no longer be profitable. It would become obsolete.
Technologically, this vision is achievable. Politically, it remains blocked. Those who benefit from war will not dismantle the system that rewards them. Not unless forced by collective awareness and mass refusal.
Nevertheless, the idea must survive. It provides a blueprint for future reform; it reminds us that war is not inevitable. It is designed. And anything designed can be redesigned.
Conclusion: Blame Is shared, but not equal
So who causes war?
First come the shadow groups. They shape incentives, they distort priorities. They plan in silence. War is their portfolio strategy. Peace threatens their margins.
Then come the politicians. They speak for others. And they normalize aggression. They dress self-interest in patriotic language. Often, they do not even know whom they serve.
Finally come the citizens. Not as villains—but as the deceived. They carry the cost. They fight. And they mourn. And yet, by failing to see the full picture, they allow the cycle to continue. Their good intentions are co-opted. Their voices are diffused.
In the end, war is not an accident. It is a product. It is assembled piece by piece by systems built to profit from it.
And until we dismantle the factory, it will keep being made.
Leave a Reply