Disbelief in God is often treated as a mark of superior intelligence. People imagine scientists, philosophers, or brilliant skeptics tearing down arguments of faith. But reality is not that simple. Even some not so intelligent people do not believe in God. They did not arrive there through complex reasoning. They reached it by relying on their own experience, unshaped by indoctrination, and by applying straightforward common sense.
Lack of religious upbringing
Religious upbringing matters. When children grow up surrounded by prayers, sermons, and rituals, faith becomes the default. But when they are not forced into such traditions, they see the world differently. Without the priest, without Sunday mass, without a family pushing them into belief, they never carry that early burden. Their minds are freer. No one filled them with doctrines. No one told them which God must be real. This absence of imposed belief gives them the chance to observe life as it is.
Practical common sense
Their reasoning is almost experimental. They think: “I will pray. If something changes, I will believe.” When nothing happens, the conclusion is simple. For them, testing faith is no different than testing a tool or a recipe. It either works or it does not. They do not need theology. They do not need philosophy. While religions tell stories about hidden miracles, they look at daily reality. They do not see divine hands moving anything. And so, they stop believing.
Absence of fallacies and biases
This is the striking part. They avoid many traps that catch far more educated minds. They do not argue in circles, saying: “God exists because the holy book says so, and the book is true because God exists.” And they do not fall into the authority bias, trusting priests only because they are priests. They do not cling to tradition just because it is old. They are not dazzled by complex words or mystical arguments. Instead, they rely on the most direct form of logic: test, observe, and decide.
By doing so, they avoid confirmation bias as well. They do not start with the assumption that God must be real and then search for signs. They look first. If nothing shows, they stop. Their logic is raw, but it is often cleaner than the reasoning of highly intelligent believers trapped by upbringing, philosophy, and culture.
Limits of their understanding
Their method has limits. They rarely understand arguments about the origin of life, the fine-tuning of the universe, or the philosophy of consciousness. And they do not read scientific debates about cosmology. They do not analyze the problem of complexity. Their thinking is not abstract. Yet this does not make their atheism weak. It makes it practical. They rely on what they see and what they test. If God never shows up, they conclude He does not exist.
Comparison with highly intelligent believers
Now contrast this with many highly intelligent believers. These are scientists, philosophers, or writers who defend faith. Most of them were raised religious. Faith became part of their identity from childhood. Even with great intelligence, they cannot detach from those roots. Emotional ties and cultural traditions bend their reasoning. They search for God not through observation but through fallacies dressed in sophisticated language.
Many of them are also naturally spiritual. They feel the need for transcendence. They seek meaning beyond material life. And they look at complexity, beauty, or morality and claim it must point to the divine. But these are not conclusions of clean logic. They are results of upbringing, desire, and fallacy. Intelligence by itself does not protect against these traps.
There is no God: Conclusion
Disbelief in God is not reserved for the intellectual elite. Ordinary people with average or even below-average intelligence can reach it too. They do not do it by engaging in abstract debates but by avoiding the very fallacies that trap others. They test prayer, they observe the silence, and they decide. Sometimes, their raw common sense proves stronger than the complicated but biased reasoning of highly intelligent believers. In the end, liberation from indoctrination matters more than IQ.
Leave a Reply