He or she has an IQ of 100, has little or no critical thinking, is full of fallacies, cognitive biases, and formal fallacies, gains information from grossly unobjective, biased and pro-brainwashing media. There was a discussion gathering about Israeli-Palestinian relationships in my hometown. Can you imagine me engaging in such a discussion? It is like explaining to Germans during the Nazi era that Jews deserve better or discussing with three years old that Theory of relativity is correct. So let me take to show you of how the Jewish lobby brainwashed Czechs.
We must not hate anyone, as hate is not a program. No anti-Semitic or anti-Palestinian sentiment has a place in this world. However, we must not tolerate oppression, violence, or any form of clientelism, including religious clientelism. I would write the same article if there were such a huge Palestinian lobby.
Who controls the Czech media?
Accoring to Forbes, the richest Czech has net worth of 17.4 billion USD. As of December 2024, the total assets of the Czech banking sector amounted to approximately $437.2 billion. So who runs the whole show?
Despite the fact that he opposed antisemitism during the Hilsner affair, Czech politician (mostly known as a philosopher in the West) Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk (1850-1937) believed that Jews controlled the press and helped the nascent state of Czechoslovakia during its struggle for independence.” As a matter of fact, the Rothschild family was the richest in the first Czechoslovakian Republic (therefore the connection to France).
The Western interconnected banking system ensures Jewish religious clientelism gets its shot by having unimaginable assets in Czech banks.
If you are so rich and interconnected with Czech oligarchs, lobbyists, crooks, you have your say in the media.
Jewish lobby brainwashed Czechs – at every level
The super-rich businessmen are brainwashed, journalists are brainwashed, scholars are brainwashed, bankers are brainwashed – and then – the stupid masses are brainwashed.
And this is correct because we should somehow tend to believe the more intelligent people should be objective (and some of them are, but must do what they do), but no. The Israeli propaganda works well from down up to the ladder.
Foreing enemy or dichotomy us/them (tribalism)
Because of the horrors of the Holocaust, people tend to pity Jewish people. They have enormous contributions in the fields of science, arts, and entertainment – and then – finance. And this is despite all the Czech antisemitism in the past century.
So when Czech media are absolutely biased, people tend to relate to one tribe – our tribe – Jewish people.
Jewish lobby brainwashed Czechs: Jewish people hardworking, Palestinains lazy
Since the complete blockage of information, Jewish people are portrayed as hardworking, but the Palestinians who are skin-colored (and Czechs are racially hateful) are lazy, violent, extremist, militant, and avoiding work (when there are actually no jobs).
I would liken this to the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia (Hitler’s regime in the nowadays Czech Republic) and ask things like. There is no foreign investment, Czechs can’t study at universities, no entrepreneurship, few jobs, and not studying at all.
Everything was prohibited because it was an occupied territory and there was a war economy.
I have heard such an argument that Palestinians had received too much money that they could be rich – yes, without having an actual state.
Israeli defends itself, Palestinians are terrorists
The Hamas terrorist attacks are nothing but heinous crimes. I have made the point that non-violence could and should be the solution.
But Israel does not defend itself – it is inherently a terrorist state with state-sponsored terrorism. They – with the huge Israeli lobby in the US – destabilize neighboring countries not caring how many people actually die.
They are unstoppable and want to create Greater Israel.
3 Israelis died, and also 10,000 Palestinians did, by the way, the gross dehumanization
In the eyes of an average Czech, Palestinians are not even agents (this is a philosophical meaning). They are not human.
Philosophically, this is a form of “epistemic injustice“—they are denied the status of moral agents who possess knowledge, consciousness, and conscience. They are not seen as capable of suffering in the same way, nor as rational beings who act with intent. This is why Czech audiences react emotionally to Israeli deaths but feel little or nothing about Palestinian deaths.
The dehumanization of Palestinians in media and political discourse makes their suffering seem insignificant, justifies violence against them, and strips them of agency. Their deaths are framed as passive occurrences, as if they simply “died in clashes” or were “caught in crossfire,” while Israeli deaths are described as “massacres” and “murders.” The language used removes responsibility from those killing Palestinians while emphasizing the intentionality of Palestinian attacks on Israelis.
Palestinians are not people
Palestinians rarely appear as individuals. When Israelis die, their names, families, and personal stories dominate headlines. When thousands of Palestinians die, they remain faceless statistics. If their stories are told, they are framed as either militants or victims, with no room for complexity. Even their grief is not acknowledged as genuine, often dismissed as politically motivated. The media criminalizes Palestinian resistance, even when peaceful, while Israeli military actions are justified as “self-defense.” Palestinian political groups are dismissed as terrorist organizations, reinforcing the idea that all Palestinians are either terrorists or potential threats. Their suffering is erased by language that justifies collective punishment. When an Israeli is killed, airstrikes, home demolitions, and mass arrests follow, yet this is presented as a necessary response rather than a war crime.
Palestinians are often infantilized, portrayed as incapable of governing themselves, with Israeli control framed as necessary. Their agency is stripped, making their oppression appear like an unfortunate but inevitable reality rather than a deliberate system of domination. Czech media and political leaders reinforce this dynamic, reacting strongly to Israeli deaths while offering only muted, generic responses when thousands of Palestinians are killed. This imbalance makes Palestinian lives appear less valuable and their suffering an afterthought.
Selective coverage
Media coverage heavily favors Israeli perspectives, ensuring that audiences are constantly informed about Israeli fears, security concerns, and political reactions. When an attack on Israelis occurs, the coverage is immediate, detailed, and emotional. Reports highlight personal stories, government statements, and international responses. The focus is on how Israeli society is affected, with in-depth analysis of political and military consequences.
In contrast, Palestinian perspectives are largely absent. We rarely hear about their daily struggles, the impact of restrictions, displacement, or their experiences under occupation. When Palestinians are affected by violence, the coverage is often vague, lacking personal details or broader context. Political statements from Palestinian leaders are either ignored or framed as defensive reactions rather than legitimate grievances. Instead of hearing about Palestinian aspirations, suffering, or resilience, the focus remains on Israeli security concerns, reinforcing a one-sided narrative.
Jewish lobby brainwashed Czechs: Palestinians suffering? Who cares?
Czech indifference to Palestinian suffering is rooted in historical, political, and media influences that shape public perception. The country has a strong pro-Israel stance, both politically and culturally, which frames the Israeli narrative as the default and sidelines Palestinian perspectives.
Czech media largely mirrors Western coverage, emphasizing Israeli security concerns while treating Palestinian suffering as a distant, impersonal issue. When discussing the conflict, the focus is on terrorism, Hamas, and threats to Israel, while Palestinian grievances—occupation, displacement, and daily oppression—are barely acknowledged. This selective framing creates an emotional disconnect, making Palestinians seem like abstract figures rather than real people with legitimate struggles.
There is also a broader historical factor. Czechs tend to sympathize with Israel as a small nation that has fought for survival, drawing parallels to their own experiences. This fosters a subconscious bias where Israeli actions are seen as necessary, while Palestinian resistance is viewed with skepticism. Since Czech society has little exposure to Palestinians beyond stereotypes presented in media, there is no strong emotional or political incentive to engage with their suffering.
Additionally, Czech political alignment with Western and Israeli policies reinforces this indifference. Palestinian perspectives are often dismissed as propaganda, and support for their cause is sometimes equated with extremism. This indifference is not necessarily rooted in hostility but rather in a lack of exposure, a historical bias toward Israel, and a media landscape that downplays Palestinian humanity.
Let’s make it inverse: The Czech Republic as nation of geniuses
He or she has an IQ of 140, strong critical thinking, no fallacies, cognitive biases, formal fallacies, gaining information from objective, unbiased media. And even when surfing through mainstream media, he or she can work with information and don’t make the conclusion Israelis are the victims and Palestinians are not.
He or she is highly educated in evolutionary biology, evolutionary psychology, so can understand how we are shaped by primitive instinct behavior (tribalism, xenophobia, coalition psychology, and alliance formation). Therefore he or she tries to avoid such behavior.
So when I talked about the proposed discussion, this one would be about proposed solutions how to stop senseless violence and make peace in the Middle East.
Conclusion
The Czech population is brainwashed to the degree that avid students can conduct semi-professional studies.
Psychology can explain why Czechs may accept Israeli propaganda without question. Cognitive psychology can show how repetition, selective framing, and emotional manipulation may shape beliefs. People exposed to biased media may internalize its messages, unable to critically assess alternative viewpoints. Social psychology can reveal how group conformity may reinforce these ideas. When most of society may support Israel, dissent can become socially costly. Clinical psychology can examine the long-term effects. Constant exposure to one-sided narratives may condition individuals to reject counterarguments instinctively.
Neuroscience can uncover how the brain may adapt to propaganda. Cognitive neuroscience can show that repeated exposure may strengthen neural pathways, making certain beliefs feel like absolute truths. Neurochemistry can explain how fear-based messaging may trigger stress responses, making people more susceptible to simple, black-and-white narratives. The longer the exposure, the harder it may be to break free. The Czech population, immersed in Israeli propaganda, may perceive Palestinian suffering as distant, irrelevant, or even justified. Their worldview may not be the result of independent reasoning but of systematic conditioning.
One-sided narrative
With the huge influence of super-rich big religious (in the case Jewish ones) interest groups, the media with its own brainwashed journalists makes one narrative.
People are misinformed and have no real information about what is happening. And if they do, they blindly side with the Israeli side, grossly dehumanizing Palestinians.
If professionals make up their minds, they can professionally study this because Czechs are one of the most brainwashed nations. The Jewish lobby just brainwashed Czechs.
It is a disgrace in terms of upholding criminal justice, human rights and humanity.
A just and lasting peace demands mutual respect, the rejection of all forms of clientelism, and an honest acknowledgment of both Israeli and Palestinian suffering. No group should be above criticism, and no people should be dehumanized. Ending violence requires dismantling propaganda, confronting biases, and fostering a global discourse rooted in truth rather than allegiance. Only through genuine dialogue and a commitment to justice can we move beyond tribal divisions and work toward a future where oppression, extremism, and manipulation no longer dictate the fate of millions.
Leave a Reply