Getting rid of religion in the US? Atheism must prevail

Being an agnostic or atheist in the US can be a tough job. As a person nurtured in the Czech culture, I am stunned listening to songs and reading comments in a manner like this: “We will meet again!” “God lent us this person, now he or she is with him for eternity!” For sane lawmakers, executive and judicial power, getting rid of religions should be a top priority.

History of atheism in the USA and unbelievable oppression

In the early colonial period, the dominant Christian culture led to widespread suspicion and legal penalties against those who openly rejected religious beliefs. Atheism, or the rejection of belief in deities, was often associated with immorality and was socially stigmatized. During the Enlightenment in the 18th century, figures like Thomas Paine began to express deistic or skeptical views. But atheism remained largely marginalized.

In the 19th century, as the U.S. expanded and diversified, there was a gradual increase in religious skepticism. This was partly influenced by scientific advancements and the writings of European philosophers. The publication of Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species” in 1859 further fueled debates about religion and science. Some individuals moved towards atheistic views. However, open atheism was still rare and socially unacceptable in many areas.

The shifts and New atheism

The 20th century saw significant shifts, especially in the post-World War II era. The rise of secular humanism, the countercultural movements of the 1960s, and the ongoing civil rights struggles contributed to a growing acceptance of religious diversity, including atheism. The Supreme Court’s decisions in cases like Engel v. Vitale (1962), which banned mandatory prayer in public schools, reflected a broader shift towards secularism in public life. Prominent figures like Madalyn Murray O’Hair, who founded American Atheists in 1963, played a key role in advocating for atheism and the separation of church and state.

In recent decades, atheism has become more visible and organized in the U.S., with the rise of “New Atheism” in the early 21st century, led by figures like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. These thinkers criticized religious dogma and promoted secularism with a new level of assertiveness. Polls indicate that atheism remains a minority position in the U.S. And acceptance of atheists and non-religious people has grown, reflecting broader trends towards secularization and religious pluralism in American society. Despite this progress, atheists still face social and political challenges, particularly in more religious regions of the country.

Getting rid of religion: How deeply rooted religions are in the USA and their specifics

Getting rid of religions is tought nut, given the fact that they are deeply ingrown to American culture.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion, reflects the importance of religion in American society. It allows for a pluralistic religious environment, where diverse religious beliefs could flourish without government interference, further embedding religion in the nation’s identity.

Religion has historically influenced American politics and continues to do so. Many political leaders have invoked religious language and imagery in their speeches. They appeal to the moral and religious sentiments of the electorate. This is evident in the frequent references to God in presidential speeches and the inclusion of phrases like “In God We Trust” on currency.

A significant force in American life

The United States is one of the most religiously diverse countries in the world. This diversity has grown with waves of immigration, bringing new faith traditions to the American religious landscape. Despite this diversity, religion remains a significant force in American life, with the majority of Americans identifying with some form of religious belief.

The Southern United States, often referred to as the “Bible Belt,” is known for its high levels of church attendance, conservative religious values, and a large population of Evangelical Christians. In these regions, religion plays a particularly prominent role in both private life and public discourse.

Many Americans are deeply committed to their religious beliefs. Surveys consistently show that a significant portion of Americans attend religious services regularly, pray daily. And they also consider religion to be a very important part of their lives. This high level of religious commitment distinguishes the U.S. from many other Western countries, where secularization is more pronounced.

Religious institutions, such as churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples, serve as important community centers, providing not only spiritual guidance but also social services, education, and charity. This institutional presence reinforces the role of religion in everyday life.

The phenomenon of megachurches, large Protestant congregations that attract thousands of attendees each week, is particularly prominent in the U.S. These churches often have substantial social influence and provide a wide array of services, from education to entertainment.

High level of intolerance for atheism

Despite the US is considered a developed country, surveys have shown that atheists are often viewed with suspicion or negativity by religious Americans. A 2019 Pew Research Center study found that Americans, on average, rate atheists lower on a “feeling thermometer” scale than they do most religious groups, indicating lower levels of warmth and trust. This distrust is partly due to the perception that atheists lack a moral foundation, which many religious people associate with belief in God​.

Studies have shown that a significant number of religious Americans would be uncomfortable with their children marrying an atheist. This reluctance highlights the deep-seated biases and the belief that religious differences, particularly atheism, could undermine family harmony or moral values.

Atheists face significant challenges in the political arena. A Gallup poll from 2019 revealed that 60% of Americans would be willing to vote for an atheist presidential candidate, which, while an improvement from previous decades, still shows a substantial level of reluctance compared to candidates of other religious backgrounds.

Atheists sometimes face discrimination in various aspects of public life, including the workplace, education, and community involvement. For example, there have been cases where atheists have been denied opportunities or faced hostility for their lack of belief. This happens especially in regions with strong religious communities.

Richard Dawkins has proclaimed something should be done. I know what

The benefits of atheism vastly outnumber the liabilities. So there is no reason for Americans to believe in the nonsense.

Ban religious schools and make theology to be paid for

It cannot be something more perverse than the existence of religious schools. And actually, this is one of the most common forms of how to transform these Brozne-age to Middle Ages myths. Getting rid of religion is a must-have.

There should be a strict ban on any religious education (from kindergarten to elementary school, high school, with an exemption of universities – but the universities teaching theology, philosophical theology, or scriptures should be paid and only commercial). Do you want the study religion? Then pay for it.

Enlightenment

Promoting atheism in the U.S. requires a comprehensive approach that touches on education, community-building, legal advocacy, and cultural engagement. The first step is fostering critical thinking. Schools must prioritize teaching logic and evidence-based reasoning to help individuals question religious claims. Scientific literacy should be emphasized, focusing on disciplines like evolutionary biology, cosmology, and psychology. This provides natural explanations for phenomena often attributed to supernatural forces. Outside the classroom, media content such as podcasts, documentaries, and blogs can present atheistic perspectives in accessible and engaging ways, challenging religious narratives with evidence and rationality.

Normalizing atheism is essential to breaking harmful stereotypes. Visibility is key, as highlighting atheists who have contributed positively to society can dispel misconceptions about immorality or hostility. Celebrating secular role models in fields like science, literature, and politics shows that atheism is compatible with a life of ethical and compassionate values. Building secular communities provides individuals leaving religion with a sense of belonging. Social events, support groups, and educational workshops can replicate the community aspects of religion without dogma, creating spaces for shared experiences and learning.

Separation of state and church

Promoting secularism as a societal value strengthens atheistic efforts. This involves challenging unconstitutional practices like mandatory school prayers and religious displays in public spaces. Equal treatment under the law is crucial, and policies granting undue privileges to religious organizations should be reformed. Legal advocacy plays a pivotal role here, supporting lawsuits against practices that impose religious beliefs on the public and providing resources for individuals facing discrimination due to their atheistic stance.

Youth engagement is critical for long-term cultural shifts. Younger generations are often more open to questioning traditional beliefs, making them a vital audience for atheistic outreach. Providing safe spaces, workshops, and resources tailored to young people can foster independent thinking and encourage open dialogue. Supporting individuals who leave religion is equally important. Many ex-believers struggle with feelings of isolation or fear of rejection. Counseling services, community groups, and personal stories of deconversion can guide and reassure those transitioning away from faith.

Mainstream mass media and social media

Media and technology serve as powerful tools for spreading atheistic ideas. Social media platforms, blogs, and forums allow atheists to connect, share ideas, and challenge misconceptions. Representation in mainstream media, such as movies, TV shows, and literature, can further normalize atheistic perspectives. Humorous or satirical content, like parodies of religious dogma, can effectively critique faith-based claims while engaging a wider audience. Creative works that celebrate science, reason, and secular values also play a role in shifting public perception.

Atheism: Morality can exist without God

Highlighting the compatibility of atheism with universal human values is another key strategy. Secular ethics grounded in compassion, justice, and equality demonstrate that moral behavior does not require religious belief. Not only this moral system is animalistic, but we need some kind of system such as total utilitarianism. Community service projects led by atheists can showcase their commitment to societal welfare. Non-religious ceremonies for life events, such as weddings, funerals, or naming ceremonies, provide meaningful alternatives to traditional religious rituals. Celebrating secular holidays, like Darwin Day, emphasizes human achievements and the wonders of the natural world.

Advocating for evidence-based policies strengthens the case for atheism. In areas like public health, education, and environmental protection, data-driven solutions often conflict with religious dogma. Campaigning for comprehensive sex education, reproductive rights (but this must be balanced), and climate action highlights the practical benefits of secular approaches. Exposing the harmful effects of religion, both historically and in contemporary society, underscores the necessity of separating faith from governance.

Group partnerships

Lastly, collaboration with like-minded groups enhances atheistic efforts. Partnering with organizations focused on secularism, humanism, and social justice amplifies shared goals. Addressing overlapping issues, such as LGBTQ+ rights or gender equality, demonstrates the intersectional nature of atheism and builds alliances with broader movements. International collaboration with atheist groups worldwide can offer new strategies and insights.

Through education, visibility, advocacy, and community-building, atheism can become a respected and understood perspective in the U.S. By focusing on shared values, fostering dialogue, and creating spaces for critical thought, a cultural shift toward secularism can be achieved.

Scandinavian model as successful

Secular societies such as those in Scandinavia offer compelling examples of the benefits of non-religious governance. These nations consistently rank among the highest globally in measures of happiness, equality, education, and quality of life. Their approach to governance prioritizes evidence-based policies over religious doctrines, creating systems that are fair and inclusive for people of all beliefs or non-belief. By separating religion from the state, these societies ensure that laws, public services, and education serve the needs of the entire population without bias or discrimination. Highlighting their success can challenge the notion that morality and societal progress are inherently tied to religious values. It demonstrates that a secular framework can not only sustain but also enhance the well-being of a nation.

Atheist enlightenment: Historical religious oppression

The historical role of religious institutions in perpetuating harm provides a stark contrast to the successes of secular societies. Throughout history, organized religion has been linked to wars, oppression, and the suppression of scientific advancement. The Crusades, for example, were marked by violence justified in the name of faith, while the Spanish Inquisition enforced dogma through torture and persecution. Religious institutions have also been complicit in colonialism, using their influence to justify the subjugation and exploitation of indigenous peoples. Moreover, scientific stagnation during periods such as the Middle Ages illustrates how religious dogma often hindered progress. Galileo’s trial for advocating heliocentrism is a prime example of how religious authorities stifled new knowledge that contradicted established doctrines. By examining these historical patterns, it becomes clear how deeply intertwined religion has been with societal harm.

The evil of religion nowadays

Modern examples of harm caused by religious extremism, bigotry, and anti-scientific attitudes further underscore the need for secularism. Religious extremism continues to fuel violence and terrorism around the world, destabilizing regions and causing immense human suffering. Bigotry, often justified by religious beliefs, manifests in discriminatory practices against LGBTQ+ individuals, women, and minority groups, perpetuating inequality and injustice. Anti-scientific attitudes promoted by some religious leaders contribute to issues such as vaccine resistance, climate change denial, and opposition to reproductive rights. These challenges illustrate how religious influence in public life can have tangible, harmful effects on society. Addressing these issues involves exposing their roots in religious dogma and advocating for policies grounded in reason, evidence, and universal human rights.

By contrasting the successes of secular societies with the historical and contemporary harms caused by religious influence, a powerful case can be made for embracing secularism as a foundation for progress and justice.

Societal progress in the USA

Secularism can play a transformative role in the United States by addressing critical challenges and fostering societal progress. A secular approach to governance, free from religious influence, enables policies rooted in logic and evidence. This creates an environment conducive to economic growth, as investors and innovators thrive where decisions are driven by practicality rather than theology. By focusing on science, technology, and education, secular policies can better position the country for global leadership in innovation and economic stability.

Human rights and gender equality would also advance under a more secular framework. In the U.S., religious influence has historically shaped debates on women’s rights, LGBTQ+ equality, and racial justice. A secular approach ensures that laws protect all individuals equally, regardless of their beliefs, gender, or identity. Reproductive rights, often a contentious issue in the U.S., could be safeguarded by prioritizing science and public health over religious ideologies. This would lead to better access to healthcare, lower maternal mortality rates, and greater autonomy for women. Equality and justice flourish when policy is informed by evidence and universal human rights rather than dogma.

Getting rid of religion: Religious extremism

Religious extremism remains a challenge in the U.S., fueling political polarization and societal tension. Secularism offers a solution by ensuring that no single belief system dominates public policy or governance. A secular government focuses on inclusivity, creating space for people of all faiths and none to coexist peacefully. Policies based on reason and inclusiveness can weaken the divisive rhetoric of extremism, fostering a more harmonious and united society. By separating religion from state, the U.S. can ensure that government actions reflect the interests of its diverse population rather than catering to specific religious groups.

Legal frameworks supporting secularism are fundamental to these efforts. The First Amendment already enshrines the separation of church and state, but its implementation often falls short. Strengthening this separation can ensure that public institutions remain neutral, serving the needs of all Americans without religious bias. Public schools, for example, should focus on evidence-based education rather than incorporating religious teachings. Protecting the secular nature of governance ensures fairness and prevents the imposition of religious beliefs on those who do not share them.

Health outcomes

Public health outcomes in the U.S. also benefit from secular governance. Religious interference has often hampered progress in areas like reproductive health, vaccination campaigns, and sex education. Secular policies guided by science can improve access to healthcare and address pressing issues such as maternal mortality, teen pregnancy, and vaccine resistance. By prioritizing the well-being of all citizens over religious ideology, the U.S. can achieve better health outcomes and address disparities in healthcare access.

Misinformation and science denial

Religious beliefs have significantly contributed to the spread of misinformation and resistance to scientific advancements in the United States. This is evident in several areas where religious ideologies directly conflict with established scientific facts. One prominent example is vaccine resistance. Despite overwhelming evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of vaccines, many religious communities oppose them based on misconceptions or theological objections. This resistance has fueled the resurgence of diseases like measles and created unnecessary public health crises. These outbreaks not only endanger lives but also strain healthcare systems, diverting resources from other critical needs.

Climate change denial is another major issue where religious beliefs have played a harmful role. Certain religious groups, particularly those interpreting scriptures literally, reject the scientific consensus on climate change. They argue that natural disasters or environmental changes are part of a divine plan rather than consequences of human actions. This mindset undermines efforts to address the climate crisis and delays the implementation of policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Religious rhetoric often influences political leaders to downplay or outright ignore the urgency of environmental protection, further exacerbating the problem.

Ridiculous creationism

The push to include creationism in school curricula illustrates how religion hampers scientific education. In several states, religious groups have lobbied for the inclusion of creationist teachings as an alternative to evolution in public schools. This undermines the quality of education and misleads students about the foundations of biology and the scientific method. By promoting pseudoscience, these efforts weaken critical thinking skills and limit students’ understanding of the natural world, putting them at a disadvantage in a global economy that increasingly values scientific literacy.

Religious-driven opposition to reproductive rights also stems from misinformation. Many religious leaders spread false claims about contraceptives and abortion, portraying them as morally wrong or harmful despite extensive scientific evidence proving their safety and importance in healthcare. These narratives have fueled restrictive laws that deny individuals, especially women, the ability to make informed choices about their own bodies. The impact is far-reaching, leading to higher rates of unplanned pregnancies, maternal mortality, and social inequality.

In contrast, secular perspectives prioritize evidence and reason, making them better suited to combat misinformation and promote scientific progress. By separating religion from public discourse and policymaking, the U.S. can address these challenges more effectively. Emphasizing critical thinking and scientific literacy in education, alongside promoting fact-based policies, would counteract the harmful influence of religious ideologies on science and public health. This shift is crucial for advancing a society that values truth, innovation, and collective well-being.

Teaching atheism in adulthood

Adulhood education focused on teaching individuals to critically analyze and move beyond religious beliefs would be a transformative step toward fostering a more rational and inclusive society. Such programs would not only challenge the dominance of religion but also equip students with the intellectual tools to embrace secularism and atheistic worldviews. These courses could exist within philosophy, sociology, and psychology departments, offering students a structured environment to question faith and explore alternative ethical frameworks. And they would be compulsory.

The foundation of such education would rest on critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning. People would be encouraged to dissect the origins and functions of religion, understanding how historical, cultural, and psychological factors shaped belief systems. This approach demystifies religious doctrines and places them within a human, rather than divine, context. Through the study of history, students would learn how religion has often been used as a tool for control, oppression, and justification of power, encouraging them to view faith as a human construct rather than an unassailable truth.

Flawed internal logic

Courses could also focus on comparative religion to highlight the contradictions and inconsistencies among different belief systems. By analyzing how various religions interpret morality (and how philsophy interprets morality), the afterlife, and human purpose, students would see that religious claims are subjective and culturally bound. This comparative approach can help dismantle the idea of any one religion holding absolute truth.

Philosophy would play a key role in these programs, introducing students to secular ethics and existentialist thought. Figures like Bertrand Russell, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Friedrich Nietzsche offer profound insights into living meaningful lives without reliance on a deity. These thinkers emphasize human agency, personal responsibility, and the capacity for individuals to create their own purpose. Students would explore questions of morality, justice, and happiness from a secular perspective, finding that these principles thrive without the need for divine authority.

Psychology and neuroscience

Psychology and neuroscience could further deepen understanding by examining the cognitive mechanisms behind belief. Why do humans develop faith? What psychological needs does religion fulfill? By exploring these questions, students would recognize that religion is not inherently necessary but rather a byproduct of human cognition and societal structures. This knowledge empowers individuals to seek alternatives for community, comfort, and purpose outside of faith-based institutions.

Education on the harm caused by religious ideologies would also be integral. Case studies on topics like the Crusades, witch hunts, and modern religious extremism would illustrate how dogmatic belief has historically fueled violence and division. Similarly, discussions on contemporary issues – such as religious interference in reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ discrimination, and resistance to science – would highlight the ongoing impact of religion on societal progress. These lessons would foster a critical awareness of the dangers of unchecked faith.

No hostility

Such programs would not advocate hostility toward religious individuals but instead promote understanding and open dialogue. The goal would be to empower students to view religion critically, reject it if they choose, and engage with others respectfully. By fostering a culture of reason, these educational initiatives could create leaders and citizens who value evidence, inclusivity, and humanistic principles over dogma.

Ultimately, adulthood education that teaches individuals to move beyond religion would challenge deeply ingrained societal norms. This shift in education could pave the way for a more enlightened and secular future.

Teaching of evolutionary psychology and evolutionary biology

Education aimed at teaching individuals to critically analyze and move beyond religion must begin with foundational lessons in evolutionary psychology and evolutionary biology introduced as early as kindergarten. These subjects should be integrated into education at every stage, gradually building in complexity. This ensures students develop a deep understanding of human behavior, belief systems, and the natural world from a young age. By framing religion as a product of human evolution rather than divine truth, this approach fosters critical thinking and rationality throughout life.

In kindergarten and elementary school, the concept of the “selfish gene” can be introduced in a way that highlights how helping and sharing are part of survival strategies encoded in our biology.

For example, children can learn that early humans often lived in small groups where everyone depended on each other. If one person shared food with someone in need, that person might return the favor later, creating a system where everyone had a better chance of survival. This is called reciprocal altruism -helping others because it increases the chance of getting help in return. Teachers can emphasize that this kind of cooperation made groups stronger and helped our ancestors survive tough times.

Kin selection simplified

Another example is kin selection, which explains why people are more likely to help family members. By helping close relatives, individuals ensured that their shared genes had a better chance of being passed on to the next generation. Children can relate to this by thinking about how families work together and look out for each other.

Teachers can also show how early humans created stories to explain things they didn’t understand, like why the sun rises or why it rains. These stories helped people feel connected to each other and their world, even before they had science to explain these phenomena. This shows how curiosity and cooperation were both important for survival.

By explaining these ideas in simple and relatable ways, children can begin to understand that sharing and helping are not just kind acts but also part of how humans evolved to thrive together. This approach balances the “selfish gene” concept with the realities of cooperative behavior.

Middle and high school

In middle and high school, lessons should expand to explain why humans are drawn to rituals and symbols. Students might learn that early humans danced, chanted, or performed rituals to build trust and unity within tribes, ensuring survival. Teachers can connect this to modern rituals like national anthems, showing continuity.

The fear of death led to beliefs in an afterlife, providing comfort and reducing anxiety. These ideas explain why such beliefs persist across cultures.

Evolutionary biology can illustrate morality’s origins. Teachers might focus on reciprocal altruism, where helping others increases the chance of receiving help in return. They can also explore group selection, explaining how cooperative behavior within groups helped them outcompete less cooperative groups.

Finally, students can explore cognitive mechanisms like pattern recognition, which led early humans to attribute natural phenomena to intentional forces, laying foundations for myths and religions. These lessons foster critical thinking and a deeper understanding of human behavior.

Getting rid of religion: Tertiary education

By the time students reach tertiary education, these concepts should form the basis for deeper analysis. Courses in philosophy, sociology, and history can critically examine the role of religion in human societies. Comparative religion studies can highlight inconsistencies across faiths, showing how belief systems are culturally specific rather than universally true. For example, students could explore how flood myths exist in many religions but differ greatly in details, showing that they are shaped by local geography and culture rather than divine revelation. Philosophy classes should introduce secular ethics and existentialist thought, empowering students to create meaning and purpose without reliance on deities.

Psychology and neuroscience would further enhance understanding. Students could explore cognitive biases like pattern recognition and agency detection. This made our ancestors more likely to believe in spirits or gods. For example, if a rustling in the bushes could be a predator, it was safer for early humans to assume intent, even if there wasn’t one. This “better safe than sorry” mechanism explains why humans are prone to see intentionality where none exists – such as attributing natural disasters to an angry deity. Evolutionary biology would offer additional insights, like explaining why humans are social creatures who rely on cooperation and shared norms to survive. Examples like the evolution of oxytocin, the “bonding hormone,” show how biology supports trust and empathy, which religions later co-opted into moral teachings.

Religion justifies violence and oppression

Historical and contemporary case studies would demonstrate how religion has been used to justify violence, oppression, and anti-scientific movements. Students could examine how religious opposition delayed acceptance of Darwin’s theory of evolution or how creationist movements continue to undermine education today. Discussions could also cover modern issues like vaccine resistance, showing how religious beliefs exploit cognitive biases, leading to harmful societal outcomes.

The ultimate goal of this education, starting from kindergarten through tertiary levels, is to foster a lifelong habit of critical inquiry. It ensures individuals understand religion as a human construct shaped by evolutionary and cultural forces. By replacing dogma with reason and promoting secular ethics, this approach equips students to face societal challenges with rationality and compassion. Teaching evolutionary psychology and biology, supported by real-world examples, from the earliest stages through higher education is essential to building a society that values evidence, inclusivity, and progress.

Getting rid of religion: Conclusion

The United States faces a critical juncture: whether to remain tethered to ancient dogmas or embrace the liberating force of reason and secularism. The pervasive influence of religion has long stifled scientific progress (because people are not inclined to make spending on science more), fostered intolerance, and hindered the advancement of human rights. History illustrates how deeply ingrained religious beliefs have shaped American culture, law, and public life, yet it also reveals the harm they perpetuate – both past and present.

Promoting atheism is not about hostility toward religious individuals but about empowering society to question irrational beliefs and embrace evidence-based reasoning. Through education that prioritizes critical thinking, evolutionary science, and secular ethics, Americans can shed the myths that bind them to outdated worldviews. By normalizing atheism, advocating for the separation of church and state, and fostering inclusive, secular communities, the U.S. can overcome the divisive and oppressive influence of religion.

The success of secular societies, such as those in Scandinavia, offers a compelling blueprint for this transformation. Prioritizing rational governance, equality, and evidence-based policies has proven to enhance societal well-being without reliance on religious doctrines. The United States can achieve similar progress by focusing on science, humanistic values, and secular governance.

It is time for Americans to transcend religious dogma and embrace the freedom and enlightenment that atheism offers. Only then can the nation fully unlock its potential for innovation, equality, and a just society. A future untethered from the constraints of faith is not just possible – it is necessary.


Posted

in

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *