My dear readers know I cannot loathe Western elites more. I hate the interconnected banking system (the Big Banks and their privatized central banks), super-rich families, multinational corporations, international lobbyists who are more powerful than POTUS, politicians (faces), lobbyists (local), crooks and movers and shakers. And this creates power patron-client relationships that are detrimental to all of us (with some exceptions). The West is truly evil. Despite adhering to some human rights, these are only basic ones. So is there something worse? Yes, BRICS countries are really morally inferior and also evil.
BRICS and morally inferior? Look at the disgusting West
The Military industrial complex and Big Oil behind the Iraq War left a few people death. I am mystificing. The U.S.-led War on Terror, initiated in response to the 9/11 attacks, has had profound and far-reaching consequences, particularly in the Middle East. Since 2001, U.S. military operations in countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan have contributed to the deaths of an estimated 4.5 million people, either directly or indirectly.
Muammar Gaddafi should have served a life sentence. As a truly wicked, evil person. But what did the West do to Lybia, a pretty functional country (this is just in relative terms)? They destroyed it.
Vietnam War, Korean War, WW1, WW2. Dou you think countries fought war because of morality. They say: “Cherchez la femme.” I would say: “Try and find economic interests.”
WW1: Myth of Jewish backstabbing, the reality of economic interests
One of the major reasons why American banks, particularly those based in New York, gave more loans to the Allied powers than to Germany was simple economics. The Allied nations, including Britain, France, and Russia, had far more substantial trade ties with the United States than Germany did. Britain, for example, was a vital trade partner, and American businesses and banks had significant financial interests tied to the British economy. When Britain imposed a naval blockade on Germany, cutting off its access to international trade, American firms found it much harder to conduct business with Germany. The blockade strangled Germany’s economy and made it less attractive for American banks to provide loans, as repayment seemed increasingly uncertain. So no Jewish backstabbing.
This dynamic intensified after the United States entered the war in 1917 on the side of the Allies. With the U.S. government now fully committed to the Allied cause, American banks became even more involved in financing the war effort. Prominent financial institutions, such as J.P. Morgan, became official agents for British and French loans, ensuring a continued flow of American money into the Allied war chest. The U.S. government encouraged this support as it aligned with its own strategic and military goals.
WW2 and Vietnam
Since the US, with unimaginable Jewish-clientelist assets in American banks (of course, they were too smart and didn’t want their wealth to have been confiscated in Europe), entered WW2, only economic interests were at stake. The notion of controlling the whole economies by economic means. And a little secret: an unnamed secret service with the largest operational scope had been intercepting the German chancellor’s communication since the beginning (hopefully I won’t be run over by a car).
The Vietnam War was nothing but sending innocent young Americans to death for the economic interests of a few super-rich. Knowing the war is lost, the Miltary industrial complex, and other, to me undisclosed facts, making sure more of the innocent men went home crippled or didn’t return at all.
Are you an enemy? A character assassination at best, torture and death at worst
Are you a powerful adversary? One unnamed secret service will make you homeless, disgraced or dead,
They will kidnap you, torture you at a black site and then you die.
“There are a lot of killers. You think our country’s so innocent?” This is not a quote of some deluded conspiracy theorist but of Donald Trump.
Criminal colonialism
Many scholars, activists, and historians argue that Africa might have been better off without colonial intervention. Colonization imposed artificial borders, disrupted governance systems, and forced diverse ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups into single political entities. This legacy often fuels internal conflicts and hinders development. Before colonization, Africa had varied societies, each with unique governance and social systems. Great empires like Mali, Songhai, and Great Zimbabwe thrived, along with smaller kingdoms and tribal structures. They had laws, trade networks, and ways to resolve conflict. Without colonial interference, these societies might have continued evolving naturally. Their systems would have suited local cultures and needs rather than European demands.
Colonial powers suppressed local religions and cultural practices, imposing Christianity or Islam under the guise of a “civilizing mission.” This often created tensions by placing different religious groups in close proximity. Without this interference, African states would have likely developed along natural cultural and religious lines. Unity would have been based on shared beliefs or peaceful coexistence. This would have reduced conflicts driven by religious and cultural divides that colonial borders only worsened.
Callous disregard for its ethnic, linguistic, or cultural diversity
The Berlin Conference in the late 19th century carved Africa up without regard for its ethnic, linguistic, or cultural diversity. Colonial borders followed European interests, not African realities. These arbitrary boundaries forced many distinct ethnic groups into single states, which fueled rivalries and conflict. Without colonization, African groups might have formed smaller, cohesive states based on shared ethnicity or culture. This could have minimized ethnic conflicts and reduced secessionist movements.
Colonizers extracted Africa’s resources for European profit, building economies focused on exports rather than local industries. This legacy has kept many African nations dependent on exporting raw materials and importing manufactured goods. Without this exploitation, African states could have developed more sustainable, self-sufficient economies. Locally oriented economies would have built resilience and independence from external markets.
European languages and education systems alienated people from their traditions, favoring a Western-educated elite while marginalizing indigenous knowledge. This disconnected many Africans from their cultures. Without this imposition, African education might have reflected local cultures and values, strengthening national identities and unity.
Divide-and-rule tactics
Colonial borders and divide-and-rule tactics fostered internal conflicts that plague many African countries today. Ethnic tensions, civil wars, and secessionist movements often trace back to colonial legacies. If Africa had been left alone, smaller, more homogenous states might have naturally formed, reducing power struggles over resources and political control.
Colonial practices also harmed Africa’s ecosystems. Intensive agriculture, mining, and deforestation disrupted local resources. Without these practices, African states might have managed resources more sustainably, preserving ecosystems essential to their communities and traditions.
While we can’t know exactly how Africa would have developed without colonialism, evidence suggests that it would have pursued more stable, culturally cohesive paths. African societies were thriving before European intervention, not “undeveloped” as colonizers often claimed. A self-determined Africa might have fostered unity, sustainable economies, and stable governance systems.
Human experiments
In discussing the darker aspects of American history, experimental programs are a deeply unsettling chapter. Behind the public veneer of progress and freedom, hidden experiments on vulnerable populations reveal systemic abuse and exploitation. These experiments didn’t happen in isolated labs – they often took place within communities, targeting marginalized groups who had little power to resist.
From the early 20th century through the 1970s, the U.S. government sanctioned human experiments under the guise of science and security. One of the most infamous is the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972), where African American men suffering from syphilis were deliberately left untreated to study the disease’s progression. They weren’t informed of their condition, nor were they given a choice. This study became a hallmark of exploitation – leaving victims to suffer and die without any semblance of medical ethics. Another less publicized but equally horrific case was Project MK-Ultra, where the CIA conducted experiments on unwitting participants, testing the limits of psychological manipulation and mind control. Subjects, often mental patients or prison inmates, were exposed to drugs and psychological torture. The aim was control, not treatment. They weren’t patients – they were tools, discarded when broken.
Evil experiments on the vulnerable
Slavery’s shadow haunts these experiments. Exploitation of Black bodies, in particular, reflects a continuation of the same dehumanizing logic that powered slavery. The United States has a dark legacy with slavery, one that didn’t just end with emancipation. Instead, it evolved—segregation, economic oppression, and targeted experimentation are modern forms of the same abuse. Slavery itself laid the groundwork for seeing certain groups as “disposable,” stripped of humanity and individuality, useful only when they served the system’s needs. This mindset justified experiments on communities who’d long been victims of American racial injustice.
The exploitation of enslaved African Americans also fed the medical knowledge base. Doctors in the 19th century often performed brutal, non-consensual procedures on enslaved people, especially women, with figures like Dr. J. Marion Sims, the so-called “father of modern gynecology,” infamously experimenting on enslaved Black women without anesthesia. These women suffered under the guise of science, denied autonomy over their bodies. This was exploitation masquerading as progress, a chilling reminder of how science can be twisted to justify cruelty.
The legacy continues today, often masked but ever-present. Policies and practices that disproportionately affect communities of color and the poor still draw from the same logic. Experimentation on the vulnerable, exploitation of the powerless- these are not relics of the past but warnings of what systems built on inequality allow.
Indigenous people genocide and slavery
American history often skips over the brutal foundations that helped build its wealth and power – enslavement of African people and the systematic eradication of Indigenous communities. Slavery wasn’t just labor; it was an industry of human commodification. Millions of Africans were ripped from their homelands, chained, and shipped in horrendous conditions across the Atlantic. Those who survived faced unimaginable brutality on American soil. Beaten, raped, and worked to death, their existence served only one purpose: profit. And it didn’t end there. Generations born into slavery continued to be seen as property, forced to build the infrastructure and economy that would make America rich. Stripped of identity, language, and family, they became economic units – numbers in a ledger, disposable in the eyes of those who held power.
Almost complete annihilation
While enslaved Africans were being forced into the American machine, Indigenous people faced a different fate – erasure. For the Indigenous nations, genocide came not just through guns and violence but through deliberate policies aimed at annihilation. Settlers brought diseases that decimated populations, but this wasn’t merely accidental. There were recorded cases of smallpox-infected blankets given to Indigenous communities to hasten their decline. Lands were seized, treaties broken. Indigenous people were forcibly removed, their cultural practices banned, children taken to boarding schools where they were punished for speaking their languages. Their lands, sacred sites, and even identities were systematically destroyed. For the American expansion to succeed, the Indigenous presence had to be erased, their histories overwritten with a narrative of conquest.
This is not distant history. It shaped today’s America. The systems of power that allowed such atrocities haven’t disappeared, they have adapted. Racial hierarchies embedded in slavery became racial segregation, discrimination, and economic exclusion. Indigenous communities are still fighting for their land rights, battling poverty, and facing high rates of violence and displacement. These histories aren’t just scars; they’re wounds that haven’t healed, bleeding into the present. America’s wealth and progress came at a staggering human cost – a foundation built on stolen lives and land, an empire constructed on genocide and exploitation, truths often buried but never erased.
BRICS is exploited, they stifle its development
The Global North systematically exploits the Global South through a web of financial, trade, and political systems that maintain economic dependency and stifle growth. At the core of this exploitation is the global banking system, where powerful institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and SWIFT enforce policies that trap developing countries in cycles of debt. Loans given to countries in the Global South often come with high-interest rates and restrictive conditions, requiring repayment in “strong” currencies like the U.S. dollar.
When the value of a developing country’s currency drops, this debt becomes even harder to repay, pushing nations further into dependency. To meet repayment demands, many nations are forced to export cheap goods and raw materials, a practice that undermines the development of local industries and locks economies into low-value sectors. In the meantime, interconnected banks and financial institutions in the Global North maintain this arrangement, ensuring a steady flow of wealth from the South to the North and preserving a state of economic dependency where growth and diversification are nearly impossible.
Beyond debt, the North enforces austerity measures on indebted countries, supposedly to stabilize their economies. In reality, these policies – insisted upon by the IMF and World Bank – cripple governments by cutting funding for health, education, and infrastructure, making poverty almost inescapable. The North has set up trade agreements that ensure their corporations benefit from cheap resources and open access to Southern markets while denying these countries the right to protect their own industries.
However, we should note that the Global South would do the same if it were in the position of the Global North.
Intellectual property only for the chosen one
In addition, stringent intellectual property laws prevent countries in the South from producing essential goods like medicines or advanced technologies, keeping them technologically backward and dependent on costly imports. This restriction reinforces a system where the Global North enjoys all the advantages: control over vital industries, access to inexpensive resources (they make sure the background elites are tied to those resources in the countries of the Global South, so status quo in technological advancement exists), and a steady supply of low-wage labor, while the Global South struggles under policies designed to keep them perpetually underdeveloped and reliant on the North. The result is a world economy structured to serve the North, with technological backwardness and economic weakness imposed on the South to ensure it never becomes a competitor.
The West is evil, it cannot get worse. Yes it can, we have BRICS
Imagine the US with all its flaws. But it doesn’t operate concentration camps. China, Brazil, and Russia do. And the torture cannot get worse. You must pay in order for the COs not to kill you.
Torture methods go beyond standard physical abuse and enter the realm of severe psychological and physical brutality. In Brazil, accounts from certain prisons reveal extreme overcrowding and gang violence used as a control tool, with torture methods including beatings, exposure to unsanitary conditions, and psychological intimidation designed to break inmates mentally and physically. In China’s Xinjiang camps, survivors report more severe torture methods: electric shocks, extended shackling, exposure to extreme temperatures, waterboarding, and prolonged isolation in cramped cells, all coupled with forced indoctrination and sometimes sterilization. Russian detention camps, particularly those holding political prisoners, have reported systematic torture such as electrocution, mock executions, asphyxiation, beatings with metal rods, and forced drug administration. These techniques aim not just to control but to instill lasting trauma, crush resistance, and erase personal identities among detainees.
Even though abuses are common, the Department of Corrections in the West doesn’t have a Gestapo-like culture.
They naturally support Russia in Ukrainian War because they hate the West, but they are contradicting themselves
In a televised press conference, the BBC’s Russia Editor Steve Rosenberg asked the president (Vladimir Putin) about “justice, stability and security” in Russia been following its invasion of Ukraine.
I wouldn’t shake hands with the Western criminal elites, needless to say the BRICS elites. Yet Narendra Modi is hugging Vladimir Putin, after all those senseless war crimes. This is their justice?
Blatant disregard for human rights
In Brazil, the poor are hit hardest. Police brutality against them is widespread, especially in favelas. Extrajudicial killings happen regularly, often with no accountability. Extreme inequality divides the wealthy few from the millions living in poverty. Basic healthcare is scarce, and people die from preventable diseases. Voters from poor communities lack real choice; they vote from necessity, not empowerment. Political promises rarely reach them, trapped in cycles of patronage and manipulation.
Russia crushes dissent. Opposition figures and activists are sent to harsh labor camps. There, they endure electrocution, mock executions, and solitary confinement. Fear rules in poorer areas, where people live under constant surveillance. Any criticism brings retaliation. Healthcare in rural Russia barely functions, and people struggle to survive on low wages and poor conditions. Voting feels meaningless. The powerful control elections, while the impoverished lack real representation. They are bought or intimidated, left voiceless in a system designed to keep them silent.
India’s detention centers hold suspected militants and separatists without trial. Detainees face torture, beatings, and forced confessions. Those in conflict zones endure harsh repression. Caste discrimination keeps millions in deep poverty, with no healthcare or education to break the cycle. In Assam, the government detains “stateless” individuals. Many live in squalid conditions, stripped of rights and basic human dignity. The poor face constant exploitation. They vote out of compulsion, often pushed by politicians who see them as a means to power, not as people in need.
Purges in BRICS countries? Sure
China’s camps in Xinjiang hold over a million Uyghurs and other Muslims. Detainees are subjected to beatings, forced sterilizations, and relentless indoctrination. Reports of torture are common, including electric shocks, sleep deprivation, and forced medication. The state exerts control over Tibet and Hong Kong too. Political dissent leads to detention, relocation, and life under inhumane conditions. Inequality in China is extreme. Rural areas lack healthcare, while cities thrive. Many are trapped in poverty, while powerful elites profit. Poor voters are controlled by fear, not choice, in a system that sees them as tools, not citizens.
South Africa detains migrants in camps where abuse is rife. Many face physical violence, overcrowding, and neglect. Xenophobia is a brutal reality. Gender-based violence remains rampant in the country, with limited protection or justice for the victims. The gap between rich and poor is severe. Many lack basic healthcare, and poverty drives communities to desperation. The political system barely represents the poor. They vote from fear or need, in cycles that keep them disenfranchised.
BRICS has sick values and they want to export it
I wrote an article about how would the world look like were China in charge. As a fierce critic of the US, this would be a true nightmare.
With the possibility of the American international system ceasing to exist, the BRICS countries would turn into autocracies and dictatorships.
Concentration camps, extra-judicial killings, complete abuse of mass surveillance, widespread torture, forced labor, political dissent, no freedom of speech, and so on.
Their sick military ambitions have been thwarted so far
I wrote about how the super-rich groups may be beneficial. The US has a strong army and, therefore exerts hard power over BRICS countries. And this is great.
Imagine the BRICS countries’ armies and their consequence. They would lead many military campaigns despite presenting themselves as peaceful.
Massive world order change would mean only those strong nations would have their own sovereignty intact.
Of course, as I wrote above, the West has a strong military appetite, but BRICS would destroy international law to its core.
Things are more complex
A third of the people in the U.S.A. are feeble-minded. Every seventh citizen is either moronic, dementia-stricken, or an alcoholic. Half of the population has roughly below-average intellect. These people, half of the nation, are robbed of the world’s complicated multiformity, complementarity, and ambiguity, and an IQ of 100 is nothing.
And this detailed article is no exception when it comes to complexity. People living in BRICS countries experience horrors.
People living in BRICS countries often face the horrors of severe poverty and inequality. Many struggle daily without access to clean water, reliable food supplies, or essential healthcare services. These hardships are intensified by poorly managed infrastructure and under-resourced public services, leaving vulnerable populations to fend for themselves. Overcrowded living conditions and environmental degradation compound these issues, as industrial policies prioritize profit over public health. Political systems, often controlled by powerful elites, can further limit opportunities for change, making it difficult for the average person to escape cycles of poverty and exploitation.
I know the pain of stifling growth, dying prematurely, no healthcare, but we live in at least a semi-democratic world (we in the West).
But if BRICS countries had grown as it had been predicted, the world would be a nightmare. Warmongering, totalitarianist, brutal, and sadistic human rights abusers.
Western values are bad, but superior to the Chinese or Russian
Western values, despite their issues, maintain a framework of rights and accountability that is lacking in countries like China and Russia. In China, millions endure relentless repression, particularly in regions like Xinjiang, where Uyghurs and other minorities are held in concentration camps. These camps, labeled “re-education centers,” use forced indoctrination and unbelievably brutal torture, including electric shocks, sleep deprivation, forced sterilization, and psychological manipulation, to break resistance and reshape identities under state control. Russia, similarly, exhibits blatant disregard for human rights, using extreme measures to suppress dissent and intimidate opposition.
Political activists and perceived threats to the state face imprisonment, often subjected to torture methods like mock executions, asphyxiation, and extended isolation. Both countries use state-sanctioned oppression and mass surveillance, viewing rights as obstacles to centralized power. While Western values have faults, they often provide checks on such abuses, fostering an environment where individuals can seek justice, voice dissent, and demand accountability – concepts that are systematically crushed in authoritarian states like China and Russia.
Conclusion: BRICS versus the West, things are complicated
No doubt the West is brutally exploiting the Global South and bringing suffering to billions.
But if we want to set an example, we cannot unleash their brutal, totalitarian, and unbelievably twisted values.
I am not denying that the West conducts such actions for money, even though at least some moral aspect is present. If human rights were promoted, we would genetically modify people to be smart and moral, reshaping an animalistic moral system (though still far from total utilitarianism).
No such issues would be present, and there would be no Global North versus Global South.
Leave a Reply